User talk:Animum/Archives/2008/September

Hey!!!
Hey, quit stealing my jokes! I paid good money for those laugh lines!

8-D Ecoleetage (talk) 03:26, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * But, but, but! I can't steal what's free! [[Image:Face-wink.svg|25px]] —Animum &middot; 03:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Hello! I just wanted to pass along my thanks for your support in my RfA from earlier this week. I hope I did not disappoint you. I am going on Wikibreak and I will let you know when or if I am back on the site -- I am trying to take time away to clear my thoughts and refocus on this and other priorities. Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

MoveRV script
Just a note, if you use the edit-API to revert the move, you don't have to delete the redirects as you can set noredirect=1. Mr.Z-man 19:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * So &noredirect=1 will delete the redirects as well when you submit the move? —Animum (talk) 14:10, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Me again
User:Rjd0060/block.js — possible to add a little box (which can be checked) to also add Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages to the page, along with the template? - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeedy. [[Image:Face-smile.svg|25px]] —Animum (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Smiley.svg|20px]] Thank you Rjd0060 (talk) 14:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Me again
User:Rjd0060/block.js — possible to add a little box (which can be checked) to also add Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages to the page, along with the template? - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeedy. [[Image:Face-smile.svg|25px]] —Animum (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Smiley.svg|20px]] Thank you Rjd0060 (talk) 14:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Cream
I see you've adopted Cream, one of my favourite playmates.

Welcome to the game :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by HappyInDeath (talk • contribs) 01:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hehe, thanks. [[Image:Face-smile.svg|25px]] —Animum (talk) 00:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Block script
Great creation, thanks so much for it. I'm script-dumb but trying to learn to use this rather than Twinkle so the one-step is much easier. I thought using "Name+indefinite" would create but it doesn't. Is there a way to block on this grounds with the tool? Thanks! TravellingCari 02:30, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I've added a new option to the script, "Spamname+indefinite," which will do just that. Best, —Animum</b> (talk) 00:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * and it worked beautifully! Thanks! TravellingCari  02:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Let's Get It On (song)
The shits too short; the sentence bout covers should just be in one of tha othe sections. My bad for not sayin nutin before

Dan56 (talk) 03:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi Animum. I would like to thank you for your support in my RfA and the confidence expressed thereby. It is very much appreciated. :) The RfA was closed as successful with 73 supports, 3 opposes and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank WBOSITG for nominating me. Best wishes and thanks again, —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 23:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * &#42;huggle&#42; —<b style="color:#002BB8">Animum</b> (talk) 23:14, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Notice of request for deletion of editor :)
, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the nomination (unless you wish not to participate); such removal will not end the deletion discussion (actually it will). Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :).  Majorly  talk  00:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Block script
It looks like there is a small bug in the blocking script, as this edit was a bit strange. Other than that, it's been working great. Thanks, - <font color="#000080">auburn <font color="#CC5500">pilot  talk  01:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It's probably a bug with the API editing interface; I'll revert to the old-fashioned way of using index.php. —<b style="color:#002BB8">Animum</b> (talk) 22:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done. Please let me know if there are other problems or if this one persists. [[Image:Face-smile.svg|25px]] —<b style="color:#002BB8">Animum</b> (talk) 22:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Keeping one thread re potential bugs. Script appears to be blocking appropriately but as seen here, isn't tagging appropriately. FFX 3 TravellingCari  02:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Fixed with this edit. Best, —<b style="color:#002BB8">Animum</b> (talk) 02:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * and tested, here. Worked like a charm and fast! Thanks so much for this nifty tool. TravellingCari  03:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! [[Image:Face-smile.svg|25px]] —<b style="color:#002BB8">Animum</b> (talk) 19:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Northern Ireland flag userboxes
Just under a year ago you had a dispute with User:Setanta747 about a userbox. Could you please have a word with and if necessary enforce the same with User:Fennessy? Many thanks.Traditional unionist (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Can you point me to the XfD where the userbox in question was deleted? —<b style="color:#002BB8">Animum</b> (talk) 20:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Beano ni/UserBoxes/NIFlagInWikipedia (2nd nomination).Traditional unionist (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. —<b style="color:#002BB8">Animum</b> (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't think you were online so when the user in question reverted me after this report I made a report at WP:AN/I - .Traditional unionist (talk) 20:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It's quite alright. [[Image:Face-smile.svg|25px]] —<b style="color:#002BB8">Animum</b> (talk) 20:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi. The above user is misrepresenting an old discussion and threatening me contray to WP:MULTI. This kind of editing is hostile(does not asumme WP:good faith) and dishonest. And as far as I know the three revert rule does not apply to reverting vandalism on user pages. <tt><font color="#2E8B57">ʄ! •<font color="#CD0000">¿talk? </tt> 19:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You are in violation of concensus. This has been pointed out to you and as a result you have been reported to WP:AN/I.Traditional unionist (talk) 19:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Magnus_logo.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Magnus_logo.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 01:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Animum/easyblock.js
Hey Animum. :) Whenever I block an IP/user with your script the user(talk)page is added to my watchlist. Is there any possibility to disable that? Best wishes, —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 23:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done —<b style="color:#002BB8">Animum</b> (talk) 01:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you. :) —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 18:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey. I'm very sorry, but I have a problem again. :( There is a new blocking option “cannot edit own talk page”. When blocking an user/an IP with your script this seems to be enabled per default. Thus I received this message from User:zzuuzz at my talk page. He advised me to have a look at this thread at the Administrators' noticeboard. There it says that this new blocking option should just enabled in rare cases (i.e. continued disruptive editing during a block). So, is there any possibility to disable this new blocking option per default? That would be great. :) Thank you, —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 13:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes. If a parameter is not specified in the data the script sends to the servers, index.php evidently interprets it as saying "no" to the option the parameter can enable; thus, if I do not specify a value for the "wpAllowUsertalk" parameter (which determines whether the blocked user can edit his own talk page), the servers will interpret it as saying "&wpAllowUsertalk=0", which would disable editing of a user's talk page.  Technical jargon aside, thanks for telling me this, and it has been ✅ fixed. —<b style="color:#002BB8">Animum</b> (talk) 21:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks again. :) —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 20:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)