User talk:Animuscerritus

Feedback on your article
Hello Animuscerritus, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before/during our coming meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 07:33, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: sufficient, but I think it would be good to mention that it is a book?
 * Links: a few more please, like in the first sentence: "German", "philosopher", "psychologist", and maybe some others.
 * Headers: I find it weird to see the header Reception as part of the historical context. A context is usually what has led to the writing/publication of the book.
 * Context/timeframe: good!
 * How was the book received: good!
 * References: good! Only one thing I would like to change: mentioning the author of the quote and reference with the quotes. It seems the source is mentioned at the end of the line before the quote, right?
 * Ready to publish: Please fix the two minor things and you are finished!