User talk:AninyMouse

, it's nice to have you on Wikipedia!
 * ~Kylu ( u | t )  04:30, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joe Boyd Vigil
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Joe Boyd Vigil, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no sources, no notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tomdobb (talk) 19:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello AninyMouse! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Joe Boyd Vigil -

Nomination of Joe Boyd Vigil for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Boyd Vigil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joe Boyd Vigil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)