User talk:Anionmission

Bengali_Brahmins
The changes you made to the article were not according to wikipedia guidelines. In particular the article is not open to your point of view(see WP:POV) nor is it meant to be a commentary. Only factual and neutral additions with reliable sources( see WP:V, WP:RS) are allowed. Discuss any changes on the talk page Talk:Bengali_Brahmins.Staticd (talk) 08:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bengali Brahmins, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- BigDwiki (talk) 18:35, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bengali Brahmins, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bengali Brahmins was changed by Anionmission (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.932041 on 2011-07-29T05:52:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:52, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bengali Brahmins, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bengali Brahmins was changed by Anionmission (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919171 on 2011-08-02T19:50:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:50, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Bengali Brahmins, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Please stop, and please learn to use lower case. Using all upper case is sometimes referred to as SHOUTING. Your edits need to have sources. I would like a reply to this. If I don't get one I'll probably conclude that you aren't interested in working with other editors or changing, and will block you. I don't mean to be rude or threatening but you really need to follow our policies and guidelines and write in standard English.'' Dougweller (talk) 08:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm giving you one more warning: Find reliable source references to support any addition you make on Wikipedia; do not remove maintenance templates without addressing the issues; do not write in ALL CAPS. If you can not abide by these guidelines, and continue to add your opinions and thoughts to articles, you will be blocked. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:23, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * In other words, you can't use the Vedas as a source, but you must use sources that conform to our criteria, and where there are differing opinions, show those, not just one opinion. And your statement that I can't understand if I'm not a Brahmin is not helpful, if non-Brahmins can't understand what you want to write than you have to write it so that anyone can understand (which is another reason why you shouldn't be using the Vedas as a source). Dougweller (talk) 09:32, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Good for you learning how not to use caps, but you still have no sources and worse yet you removed requests for sources. Why should you be allowed to continue to edit? Dougweller (talk) 10:34, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * As you've been told on my talk page, you need to read WP:PRIMARY. You need sources that meet our criteria at WP:RS, preferably academic, that discuss what the Vedas have to say. You can't use the Vedas (or the Bible) the way you are trying to do. Dougweller (talk) 06:03, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Bengali Brahmins, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Per this.  He  iro 06:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC)