User talk:Anir1uph/Archive 2

Wiki policy is to assume good faith. A reference is one google away.
Wiki policy is to assume good faith in other editors and use the citation needed tag rather than blindly reverting things assuming bad faith in other editors. googling m982 cep 5m is harder than blindly reverting. But I wouldn't call it hard. Please follow wiki policy and assume good faith in other editors. Thanks! TeeTylerToe


 * As an editor who is changing established content to an article, it is your responsibility to provide references. Please understand that my reverts were based on that, and not bad faith. Until you give me reasons to, I will always assume good faith in all your edits. Thanks! PS The new source you provide clearly states that is is a compilation of data from Wikimedia itself, and hence is not a reliable source. It would also be beneficial to check the mathematical analysis behind CEP. Thanks! Anir1uph (talk) 02:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * wiki policy is not to assume good faith on edits wiki editors do not make, it is to assume good faith on edits wiki editors do make. You continue to assume bad faith on my part when in fact, the search terms m982 cep 5m was too specific.  The reason that I edited the article to read a cep of from 20 meters to 5 meters is because I have not seen an authoritative source confirm a CEP in the range of 5M no matter how you define CEP (whether you use the standard 50% assumption or not), and from the reports the accuracy predictions seem to still be maturing, so I believe it is safe to say that it has a cep in the range of 20M to 2.86M.


 * I suggest you put more effort into resisting the temptation to revert edits in bad faith, and instead add content to the wiki. Even google a thing or two once in a while if you feel particularly daring.  Thanks!


 * I will still be reverting your edits if they lack proper references. Please keep in mind that my edits are in good faith, that you are trying to improve the wikipedia, but the information that you are adding is of dubious nature. This is to encourage you to find proper references before challenging established info on an article. Please also keep in mind WP:AOBF. Thanks! Anir1uph (talk) 04:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The wikipedia would be better if you spent the effort you spend on assuming bad faith on something constructive, like adding citation needed tags if you're rushed or lazy, or doing a simple google if you actually want to contribute to the wikipedia. You seem to have confused the revert link for the citation needed tag.  The revert link is used to revert mistakes.  The citation needed tag is used to mark parts of articles that lack citations.  Good-faith Googling Revert only when necessary  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeeTylerToe (talk • contribs) 06:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:BURDEN both of you. -- D Big X ray  09:57, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree with you, DBigXray. I did the changes as the editor was replacing existing referenced data with new un-referenced data (changing accuracy figure from 20 m to 5 m). And after that, instead of providing constructive sources, the editor initially provided clearly dubious refs (which i reverted) and started a personal attack on me and started labeling my edits as bath faith, without himself assuming good faith with my edits. I initiated a discussion to reason with the editor on the editor's talk page, which led to more personal attacks on me. I do not believe i did anything wrong, or out of line from Wikipedia policies. If i have clearly violated any policy, kindly mention it to me. Thanks! Anir1uph (talk) 17:22, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Cool down Rambo! relax, I know you are not at fault. I told both of you for a reason, to tell the new user to be careful and to you to understand that you are not wrong. Please note that new users are not aware of the guidelines and their response (outburst ? ) is primarily due to the fact that someone has undone their hard work. So it would be best if you Welcome the user, give a sweet and short response and possible inform him about the editing guidelines. (as you might already have seen from my messages on his talk page. ) will be glad to help you ,cheers -- D Big X ray  18:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh no i wasnt heating up, just giving you a summary. :D i am just a little over-stretched, as this issue has prevented me from concentrating on my regular edits on article space/my watch-list. :) and thanks! I tried to be gentle. And i will be more so in future to new editors. Thanks for that! Anir1uph (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * yeah I had seen all that thats why commented. These are the unpleasant side of vandal fight (have faced a lot of it myself), dont burnout ;) and dont forget to give away some WP:Wikilove -- D Big X ray  18:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

 Hello Anir1uph, DBigXray has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.


 * Hahahah! Thanks! This definitely made my day! :D Anir1uph (talk) 18:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

revert of my edit to page Llanfairpwllgwyngyll
Hi, I notice you recently reverted an edit I made to that page under the IP address 90.209.204.199. If you feel that my substitution of the previous audio file for new one damages the quality of the article, feel free to comment in the section I began on the article talk page. Cheers. RWyn (talk) 13:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks! It was a major change to the article, without any discussion in the talk page. I have no knowledge on the issue, but i am satisfied with the consensus achieved during the discussion on the talk page section that you started. Thanks! Anir1uph (talk) 17:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:13, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Need your opinion
Opinion needed here, thank you. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   12:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Mrt3366  (Talk?)   07:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Mrt3366  (Talk?)   10:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Wrong edit summary using STiki
Some 20 of my edits done using STiki have been done with edit comment "seems like advertisment, seems like copy and paste job from school's prospectus" which was used by me for some article, and then i forgot to revert it to the default setting. I am sorry for this lapse. If any patroller/watcher of the page sees my reverts of some good faith edits accompanied by this seemingly funny edit comment, i want to say it was a mistake. The edits were all justified, and the edit reason for all of them are the usual - reverting good faith un-constuctive/un-referenced (in case of living persons) edits. Thanks! Of course, you are welcome to discuss any edit i have done on my talk page. Anir1uph (talk) 06:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Need help
Need your comment here. Thanks in advance. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   11:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Need help again
Somebody just moved the page from the subspace to a separate article. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   15:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't know how to revert this. Maybe administrator help is needed. Have to contact DBigXray ASAP. Anir1uph (talk) 16:07, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I reverted the page move. We must be careful about this! Anir1uph (talk) 16:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * A) You should not implement something until the discussion is closed
 * B) You don't have a consensus, discussion is still ongoing, and objections have (now) been raised
 * C) You should never draft something in the main article namespace
 * D) You both need to learn to assume good faith
 * -- W.  D.   Graham  16:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * A)There was no discussion from your side. Your action was without consensus.
 * B)We have consensus, which was achieved after spending considerable time on my talk page and the article's take page.
 * C)Never is a strong word. The article is a replacement for the existing article. IT is being constructed by multiple users. Construction in user sandbox will prevent other users interested in the page to contribute to it.
 * D)No faith was assumed. And please stop WP:AOBF. Not interested. Anir1uph (talk) 16:26, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * A) There is a difference between being bold and prematurely implementing a proposal still under discussion
 * B) The discussion that I saw had been open two days, and regardless, it was still open#
 * C) WP:SUBPAGE, Disallowed uses, point 2 "Writing drafts of major article revisions, e.g., Example Article/Temp in the main namespace"
 * D) You reverted one of my edits without reading it, and claimed that I was "faulty" in an edit summary.
 * -- W.  D.   Graham  19:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * A) Exactly! It was explicitly discussed that the proposal should be implemented.
 * B) Again, it was discussed that we start building a new page, and so we did.
 * C) Agreed, that was faulty, but gives you no reason to unilaterally move the page to a separate article, without talking to the editors first, and suggesting shifting to a sandbox. You could have done that, since you are a much more experienced editor on wikipedia.
 * D) I reverted your edits to move the article back to its subspace, not for anything else. It was when the new page refreshed, that i realised that moving pages would not work that way, and so i first reverted my edits, and then moved the page back to where it was. Anir1uph (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey Graham! Whatever our initial differences, we seem to have worked it out fine on the talk page. Cheers! Anir1uph (talk) 21:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I moved the page from the article subspace to my user-space to avoid further complications. If that is unhelpful, please revert it. You (as well as any well-meaning editor) are welcome to assist in its construction by adding relevant info about the missiles.  Mrt3366   (Talk?)   08:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
 D Big X ray  05:54, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Comparison of ICBMs
A tag has been placed on Comparison of ICBMs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 12:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Auto Wiki Browser
Hi! I nominated you for AWB rights as you have more than 3000 articlespace edits(around 800 automated though..doesnt matter)..you will probably be granted the rights.Watchlist this page to see the status.Regards  TheStrike  Σagle   15:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I checked up AWB, but i didn't think i'd like to use it much. But might do so in future. :D But hey! what do u mean by 800 automated edits? Where? I dnt have a bot a/c, do i? :P Anir1uph (talk) 15:28, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * edits using Stiki,Twinkle etc are counted as automated....because we just click a button and the script does the rest..........even I dont know how to use it......but..if access is granted now...maybe useful in future..  TheStrike  Σagle   15:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * haha! But hey, i think only bot edits are automated. As automated would mean "without any human control" and my STiki edits are 100% controlled by me. Maybe DBigXray would know for sure :D Anir1uph (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * no.......instead of adding a talkback template manually..or instead of placing the cleanup templates manually...you just do that by a click.Isn't that automated?.;) see this to get a clearer idea. BTW, it seems you should request the permissions yourself.You may add a comment below my nomination to assure people there that the nomination is accepted by you..remove my nom and re-add it.Regards  TheStrike  Σagle   15:06, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks!

A barnstar for you!
Hey! Thanks! You seem to have all the qualities (and the dedication) to be an excellent wiki-editor! Anir1uph (talk) 03:24, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The first month on Wiki is crucial for new editors. You and a couple of other excellent veterans have made my decision to continue, and take it seriously as an editor and eventual creator of articles (hopefully). There are good, bad and mad on here. Luckily, I have encountered only the good and positive (so far :)) You are a credit to the project.Irondome (talk) 04:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks! But hey, i am pretty new here too. But i do spend a considerable amount of time here now, due to my summer vacations :) Also i would urge you to become efficient and well versed in wikipedia policies. This will be a slow but essential process, and needed when you start making bold and major edits/reverting vandalism to articles. Dont worry about bad editors. :D Anir1uph (talk) 04:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

I cannot do it all alone
I need your active support and collaboration dear. I invite you to work with me on this list (like you promised). If you choose to respond to the invitation, your contribution will be very much appreciated, albeit there's no obligation! Cheers  Mrt3366   (Talk?)   09:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reminding me. I got slightly busy with other things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anir1uph (talk • contribs) 10:51, June 24, 2012 (UTC)

Operation Jackpot
Dear Mr Anirvan Shukla, First of all I would like to thank you just because you are an Indian Citizen.I like this country very much. India is our best friend.A friend in need and a friend in deed.Ten thousands Indian Soldiers obtaited their lives for the freedom of Bangladesh.India feed 9 Million Refugges for nine month without any help of foreign country during our liberation war. We respect Mrs.Indra Ghandhi,without her help it was not possible to achieve our freedom with in nine months. Thats Why, while going back to Bangladesh,I always visit Calcutta and Bashirhat.I can not forget my memories ever about those days of 1971. With pleasure I introduce myself,as Bangladeshi born German Citizen.I am from Khulna,Bangladesh.I joined student league in the year of 1968(a student Organisation of Awami League) while I was a student of class 8. I became organising seceretary of Student League Satkhira in the year of 1970.I am sure you are aware of the fact that we Bangladeshis were neglected by Pakistanis in various fields since 1947.In 1970 election our party own the majority seats but power was not handed over to sk.Mujibur Rahman.In fact Pakistani Military Janta and Pakistanis pressed us in all possible level. Bangladesh is a county where we have 15% citizens folllow other religion than Islam.Our party has been fighting for the right of other religious peoples right since 1954. Our leader,father of the Nation Bangobhandhu Sk.Mujibur Rahman was jailed for 14 years by Pakistanis.In the year of 1971 on 7th March,he decleared the freedom of Bangladesh and non cooperation movement with Pakistanis started.During this time,I and our party friends arrested the Pakistani Sub-divissional Officer who was Pakistani and brought him to India and handed him over to SDO Bashirhat. And on 26th March Sk.Mujibur Rahman was arrested from his house.From the same day the Pakistani Military Janta started killing people in all districts of Bangladesh. We setup our camp at Vomra Boarder on 29th March 1971.From Vomra to India(Ghogadanga) is just 500 meter distance.There was BSF Camp who use to supply us all kind of support. We received lot of help from west Bengal for our people.We use to help the refugges who were then escaping from diffrent district of Bangladesh. The Islamic fundamentaist group like Jamate E Islam and Muslim League became the supporter of Military Janta and helped the Pakistan Army in all possible fields. The Awami League leaders went to exile to India and formed an Exile Govt.I any my friend party actvist went to India and took Shelter at Bashirhat a subdivission near to Satkhira. A training camp and reception camp was opened at middle of April,1971 at Tokipur by the initiative of Indian Govt and with the help of Mr. Robin Sen Gupta Ghas,who is wiedely known as GHAS DA at Bashirhat. I, Mir Mustak Ahmed Robi,Subbroto Bose Bilu,Taraquel Islam(who is now well known TV and Film Actor in Bangladesh) joined in that camp.We were all together 500 Trainees in that Camp.Major Jalil,S.M. Firo were our camp commander. On 13th May 1971, Submariner A.W.Chowdhury,Submariner Rahamatullah and 6 other Submariner where Submariner Ahsanullah was also present with them, came to our camp at Tokipur with other high Ranking Indian Naval Officer to recruit Naval commandos. I and Robi Obtaied for the job and along with other 15 persons we were selected  from our camp for training.We were then tansported to Pallasy.We started at about 11 o clock on 13th May for Pallasy from Tokipur Camp and arrived  at Pallasy at  about 7.30 P.M. we slept under Pallasy moument on  the ground for that night.There we are introduced with Sub-Lt.Kofil of Indian Navy officer who was at Pallasy bunglow.On the next day more 55 trainnes came from diffrent  places of Indian Reception camps to pallasy for Naval commando training along with us. on 14th May,1971 at about 11.30 Indian Dogora Regiment Truck brought for us 12 Tents and food suppy. From then on they regularly brought us ration and other necessary supply.By end of May we had our own kitchen,only we use to get ration from Indian Army daily. On that day more Indian Navy Officer came to our camp, among them Lt.Das the only Bengali officer(who was Killed in Farrakah Fighting with Pakistan Army and received Mahavir Chokro Award from govt of India.) On next day we receive our commando numbers, my friend Mustak Ahmed Robi got 001 number and my number was 0069.The number was not given as per merit,it was given as per serial of line. The whole 70 Commandos were divided into 8 gropus and our training started at Vagirothi river.In mid of June more 200 Commandos joined us,in this way by July,71 we became appox. 500 commandos but our groups remained eight. The best commandos were chosen to Group A or Grade A in this way we had till H Group or Grade.I was the commander of Group A. Our Camp Commander was Commander Summonth and Lt.Commander Martis.During our training our camp and training were several times visited by Admiral Nanda who was Chief of Indian Naval Stuff,as well Lt.Gen.Gagjit Singh Aurora and Col. M.A.G.Osmani Commander of Bangladesh Armed Forces.In four months they visited our camp 14 times.The visits were  highest visit of such high ranking officer to any Bangladeshi training camp.It means from the very begining,importance was given to us and our operation. More then 500 places traiing were given to Bangladeshis. As the best commandos I had the oppourtunity to receive the above said officers from our small Heliport many times along with our officers. Due to my sincerity,outstanding performences in under water demulation and night swiming and group task I was liked by all our officers.And I got 7 A out of 7 subjects. Oh yes all seven who flew from Pakistan Submarine were our instructors .But in reality training was given by Indian Officers. After the training,on 22nd July,1971 we 60 were selected for Operation in Monglaport. Some were selected for Chittagong,Narayanganj,Faridpur etc.We were transported from Pallasy to Brackpur on 25th of July 1971  and then from Barackpur to Port Canning Matler for final Briefing and command giving meetting on 27th July,1971. Among these 60 Commandos who were chosen for Mongla port operation Submariner Ahsanullah was not at all there.Neither he was selected for first Operation at Mongla Port. On 27th July,1971 after our arrival at Port Canning Matler,we saw more 200 C&C Commandos of Bangladesh at Matler.The job of these commandos were  to give us covering during our operation. At 3.30 P.M. Lt.Gen.G.S.Aurora,Brig.Salik the then Brigade Commander of Barackpur Cantonment,3 high ranking Indian Officer and Regional Director of Calcutta Radio Canter came by two helicopters to Matler.I was called from my tent,and I was only the Bangladesh who was called in that meetting.It was a TOP SECRECT meetting. There I was advised about the warrning and action song which were played several times and I was given other important order about operation. At the end of the meeting, It was decleared by Lt.Gen.G.S.Aurora that it is the decession of both the High Command India and Bangladesh that Aminur Rahman,Khosru will command the Mongla port.The whole troops will go from now onwards under his command.He will give the command of operation date and give all instruction about operation. From C&C Commando side the Commanders were Mr.Raja(An Ex Patty Officer of Pakistan Navy) and Mr.Khijir. But they all came under my command.On that day we started for Mongla and we sucessfully finished the operation on 15th August 1971.More you can read in Talk page where I mentioned details about operations.There was no Submariner Ahsanullah and he was not even in 60 commonds list. Infact after lieberation of Bangladesh,I joined in College and did my HSC in the year of 1972 and did my bachelor degree in the year of 1976 and 1977 I came to Germany for higher studies.I could not trace the details of liberation war from Germany.There was no Internet at that time.To make phone call to Khulna we had to wait 3 days and had book International Call. After finishing my studies I got again involved in politics in FRG and many years I was the President of German Awami League. Currently I am Adviser of German Awami League and convenor of Freedom Fighter Association of Germany. It is really very painful,to see a wrong information about our freedom fight in any media spcecially like Wikipedia, 3 Million people were killed and 2 Hundread thousand women were raped by Pakistani soldiers and even our friend country's 10,000 soldiers sacrifice their lives for our freedom.Thats why one who will cheat with the histry of our freedom fight,he  will never be excused in future. You mentioned several times about the authentication of the fact and book.The Naval Commando Jopurnal Edited by Mrs.Tayeba Khatoon from Khulna are well known in Bangladesh and this could be very well a reference.Not all the references have Isbn numbers nor all the journals are blogged in google.You can also find in the book of Admiral Mihir K,Rays  War in the Indian Ocean. There he has mentioned my name in operation Mongla Chapter.I can also send you copies of mail which I sent to Indian Naval head quater.But if you need more references I shall be glad to send you.You can also help me to find more details from India. My mail address is: mactexgermany@t-online.de, I shall be too glad if you provide your mail address. Please fell free to write me.I shall be glad to receive more question about Operation jackpot.Please also see the talk page,where I mentioned more about Operation Jackpot. Best wishes, Aminur Rahman,Khosru --Frankfurt55 (talk) 19:31, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I am happy to see your comments. I would urge you to read Verifiability, No original research and Identifying reliable sources. On wikipedia, something that would be obvious to one person may not be for another. Hence every claim/fact/detail must be verifiable independently from neutral sources. Sadly, without reliable sources to support your information, it will be reverted. I would urge you to find some or any reliable sources to support the additions to the article. Also, while giving book references, please provide the ISBN of the book. That itself should be enough. I sympathize with your changes, which seem authentic to me, and you could even convince me by sending your own paperwork, but sadly that would not work as you'd have to repeat the whole process for every editor who would seek to remove the unrefernced/unverifiable info. That would be a problem for you, as well as the other readers of wikipedia who would be seeing different versions of the article every time. I again urge you to provide some searchable online ref or a book that is unbiased/reliable (possibly with an ISBN).
 * Please also know that I have nothing against you, and nothing but a feeling of friendship and respect for your country.
 * Also, you may write to me here, but you can also go to my user page and click on the option to send me a mail. Thanks! Anir1uph (talk) 07:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

ICBM by country
Ive made some suggestions on the Jericho. Good to see you are involved too. Irondome (talk) 07:46, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Citations and repair
Hi, I have few suggestions for you. while working on Indian articles, I am sure you must have come across dead links or barelinks URL. Please try to revive the dead links using a google search for the article title (within quotes). *http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py is a good link to prevent bare url from WP:LINKROT
 * Also see WP:WEBCITE to understand how u can archive important sources so that they do not die later on. (Webcite is great and the best in my opinion.) The article on Indian weapons need them specially to verify the specifications etc.
 * Do let me know about ur thoughts or if you have any questions regarding these.-- D Big X ray  07:55, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! This seems useful. I have come across dead links, and i mark them with the template. Also, I add lot of references in my editing, and this seems a great way. Anir1uph (talk) 08:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Glad to be of some help. you can use inside the ref tags and at the end of ref tags, they place it either on the reference section or in the article section, depending on whther the are inside or outside ref tas. Sometimes for imp refs that are missing, I place them both inside and outside refs. Did you try the bookmarklet ?.-- D Big X ray   08:08, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh i did not know that. Will keep that in mind. No i have not tried bookmarklet yet, as i am busy with the list of ICBM page and my watchlist, which has been ignored cz i cudnt log in for the last 2 days. :) Anir1uph (talk) 08:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * cool, Dont forget to give it a shot :) -- D Big X ray  08:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Please try to use the ref template in the edit box toolbar. I have improved to   This is important so that bots can parse the refs. and it looks cleaner and professional also. sorry for nagging. thats all :)-- D Big X ray  08:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure, sure, will use that from now on. M just a lil lazy about such stuff, untill recently, when i discovered the cite template is available directly on the edit page. Will make a conscious effort from now on. Thanks! Anir1uph (talk) 08:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * By the way, is it essential/important to name a ref, if i am only going to use it once? Anir1uph (talk) 08:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Its a good practice to name the refs, so that it can be easily used on the page again if needed. -- D Big X ray  10:43, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Cheers :)
Appreciate the support as always my friend. I think our mutual friend needs some encouragement in this difficult list at the moment. Always here to help if real life pressures allow me the time :)Irondome (talk) 10:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure sure! :) Anir1uph (talk) 11:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Need your help here. Mrt3366   (Talk?)   09:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Longewala
I have checked the citation from the book, The content is correct and considering the number of soldiers, it seems reasonable. moreover WP:V is preferred over WP:SYNTHESIS -- D Big X ray   11:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Then please make suitable changes to other parts of the infobox too. It is not possible that Pak Army came in 140 odd trucks and 500 of those were destroyed :D Does the book say anything about the number of Pak troops? Anir1uph (talk) 11:06, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Book says the Mobile infantry brigade was involved, and as we know brigade is rather large.
 * yeah i know. as of now the infobox does not give the source for the strength, will look at it whenever i am free. You can also verify the strength section. do let me know if you find  something interesting. -- D Big X ray   11:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * An infantry brigade strength is ~2500 troops (source: dad is a colonel in the army :P). Will find out sources for the battle. Anir1uph (talk) 11:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This says the same thing regarding troop size The Truth Of Courage Anir1uph (talk) 11:33, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The books on it will be a better source to use for the data. Have you tried ?-- D Big X ray   12:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Fascinating. Just read the account of the action. I have some knowledge of the Indo-Pak conflicts. Puts me in the same mind as the Valley of Tears Irondome (talk) 11:36, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes Irondome thanks for sharing the link, reading -- D Big X ray  12:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

I always find the action very moving when I re- read it. The wiki account is excellent. There are other sources available. A remarkable action. Irondome (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited Karwar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Buddha

 * And That's the Way It Is check this out 
 * Also try reftag.appspot.com its helpful. -- D Big X ray  12:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure :)

Need some immediate technical help
Here and here. Please resolve the dispute (if you feel there is one). Mrt3366  (Talk?)   17:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Check if this diff is fine (especially the claim and the link). I suspect it might be WP:SYNTHESIS. Mrt3366   (Talk?)   11:11, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This is definitely wikisynthesis. This is just extrapolating. The should be left with as N/A (not available). Anir1uph (talk) 11:21, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. Mrt3366   (Talk?)   11:53, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Agni V CEP
We all know that Agni V is an improved version of Agni III, right? This source claims that the CEP of Agni III is 40 m. And moreover, this TOI report says, "The accuracy levels of Agni-V and the 3,500-km Agni-IV (first tested in November 2011), with their better guidance and navigation systems, are far higher than Agni-I (700-km), Agni-II (2,000-km) and Agni-III (3,000-km)". My question is, can we include 40 m as the CEP of Agni V? Feel free to disagree. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   12:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Risks_to_civilization,_humans,_and_planet_Earth
I noticed you pulled a pointer to Lifeboat foundation while leaving two other organization. I know all three organization and the founders, had lunch with one of the ones still listed a couple of weeks ago. None of them are notable on the scale of Michael Jackson, but they are on a par with respect to each other. And while I don't think any of them are up to the task they have set for themselves, I don't know of any organizations that are doing better than they are. I can revert it, but would prefer you reconsider and do so. Keith Henson (talk) 17:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I removed it giving the reason: notability, which i measured from the fact that the other 2 organisations have their own wikipages, which are quite detailed, and i cud not find a wikipage for Lifeboat foundation. If you can add its wikipage, i have no problem at all with the additions. Thanks! Anir1uph (talk) 17:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * If you Google for "Lifeboat Foundation" there are many pages of results and the main web site is here: http://lifeboat.com/ex/main


 * I will ask for someone to put up a wikipage or do it myself in a few days. Keith Henson (talk) 20:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Googling for anything gives hundreds of results. Yes, creating a wikipage first would be better, and that would indicate notability. Thanks! Anir1uph (talk) 08:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Lassi for you ! ! !


 D Big X ray  has given you a glass of chilled Lassi with mint. Thanks for staying calm and civil! Lassi promotes WikiLove by making you cooler and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a lassi, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

 'So that you can carry on with your civil discussions. Missile discussions need extra calmness specially with New users'  -- D Big X ray  15:36, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Spread the lovely, cool, sweet goodness of Lassi by adding {{subst:Lassi}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks! I hope i am doing well. :) Anir1uph (talk) 16:01, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

-- D Big X ray  21:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Goenitz
Google is the best source that his first name is Leopold. Please do not revert my edit to this article again. Thanks! Siegfried Stauffen (talk) 21:42, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * ✅ and welcomed and placed uw-editsummary at User talk-- D Big X ray   21:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks DBigXray! Anir1uph (talk) 22:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * ......And Blocked for vandalizing -- D Big X ray  22:43, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Yup just saw, and i was about to revert all the vandalism he was causing, but Jim1138, who apparently was on Huggle beat me to each and every one of them :D haha! Anir1uph (talk) 22:47, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * LoL, And that gave me old memories of my huggle days, got nostalgic and started huggling -- D Big X ray  23:05, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

A Lamborghini for you!
Oh this is AWESOME! :D yep, one day... :) Anir1uph (talk) 08:29, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Agni V CEP, is "ibtimes.co.uk" a reliable source? Mrt3366  (Talk?)   09:10, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Again.  Mrt3366   (Talk?)   11:08, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Reference to the article titled "Indian Institutes of Technology"
This is in reference to second and third para in the article titled "Indian Institutes of Technology". The second paragraph of the article reads "The 1961 act lists seven institutes". But it must be brought to attention that the IIT Biill 2012 has been published in the gazette and its an Act now. Institutes of Technology Act 1961 stands amended therefore and anyone filing an RTI and asking about the institutes included in IT Act 1961 would be replied with 16 institutes. The link for the Gazette notification is this: http://www.iitbbs.ac.in/pdf/IIT-Amendment-Act-2012.pdf. So the statement that "The 1961 act lists seven institutes" is false with effect from 21st June 2012. Hence its my request to accept the changes made by me in the concerned paragraphs. I have also posted a link over there which is as follows: http://164.100.24.207/bull2/2012/26.06.2012.pdfwhich clearly shows that Institutes of Technology (Amendment) Bill 2012 is an Act now. Please refer to item no. 21 in the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pulkit.26mar (talk • contribs) 18:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Good Faith Editors adding unsourced infor
Have you tried the template User:DBigXray/ref, might be handy :) -- D Big X ray  21:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * this is very useful, yeah, and i have seen you adding this to a many newbies :) will be adding this to my wikipedia tools :) Done! Here Thanks! :) Anir1uph (talk) 04:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Please Comment
Please comment on this. Should you choose to respond to this invitation your feedback would be valued. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   11:58, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 17:11, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia server problem
Sorry about the tb messages, but the flag kept on coming up saying that the server could not process my edit. I was shocked, now, to see that they were being posted anyway! I tried it twice with Twinkle and then twice with just the template.

Cleared it all off now, as I came here after reading your reply of agreement. Cheers, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 15:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)