User talk:Anir1uph/Archive 7

Christianity's Criminal History - please be more specific
Please see my notes on Talk:Christianity's Criminal History: Be more specific about your desired improvements, please! -- Nlmarco (talk) 15:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Replied. --Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 15:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:59, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 01:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Aero India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Tata


 * Nirbhay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Tata

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Message
Hello Friend,

Your previous edits to Modern equipment and uniform of the Pakistan Army don't seem constructive to me. You have removed all the new data added to improve the article. I want to make it clear that I have added new weapons in Small Arms section which, if you check out > # Users will make you aware of the improvements done to the page by me. They are accompanied with references also.

I hope you won't vandalize the page again. Thanks... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoccupiedkashmir (talk • contribs) 16:20, 27 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Please donot add unreferenced info to the page or i will remove it. Please donot use blogs, as they are not reliable sources. Also, please understand the meaning of vandalism. Reverting your uncited changes is not called vandalism. Thanks. --Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 16:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)


 * All the new weapons that I have added are accompanied by references.. You should check them out on the corresponding pages .. like M2 Browning, Sterling SMG, etc... check their users .. all have reliable ref's — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoccupiedkashmir (talk • contribs) 16:30, 27 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Please use inline citations. Also don't revert to the bare references. Thanks! Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 16:35, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

I think you have got me now.. & yah i want to tell you that the page (when I started improving it) contained mere inline references. All other objects were dependent on page citations .....Cooperate to improve the page...Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoccupiedkashmir (talk • contribs) 17:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * i saw those pages, and i saw the refs there. That is a start, but you need to add those refs to this page - [[Modern equipment and uniform of the Pakistan Army too. Or they will be removed as they are unreferenced on it. Also, please do not violate 3RR or edit war, or you may get blocked from editing. Keep up the good work! Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 17:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I have added references to all the new weapons I added to this wiki article .. Thanks --Theoccupiedkashmir (talk) 17:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Great great! I will fill out the refs using Reflinks. Or you can try that from REFLINKS. Thanks! Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 18:00, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
I know that, but I still wanted to change it for some reason. I already knew that, but thanks for telling me anyway. Cheers. Zebusadams (talk) 17:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Cheers, then. I was worried you might get blocked. :) Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 17:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Review and rating
I am waiting for your valuable review, regarding the new pages/articles added by me. Please do rating at the end of the pages. I am thrilled that i have a peer. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vyas1975 (talk • contribs) 10:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I will do so shortly. The amount of work you have done in such a short time on navy articles is amazing! :D Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 12:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 20:42, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited INS Jyoti (A58), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

AMCA Edits
thanks for the msg on my talk page. But I think you should put the livefist link back, just for the photos. Its highly unlikely we will ever see AMCA pics in any national/international newspaper until its inducted. Livefist is the blog of a reputed defence journalist. Look him up if you like. Cheers. Mycrofth (talk) 19:47, 5 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree. I have made the required changes. The slight problem with livefist is that Shiv doesnt get published in a newspaper, unlike Broadsword, whose articles have a stamp of reliability as the Colonel gets published at Business Standard. Yeah, i am an avid follower of both the blogs, along with others. They may not be reliable by wikipedia standards, but they are usually the earliest sources of interesting news. :) Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 20:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 04:21, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for your post on my talkpage. As you may notice, the same old bully boys and hooligans are still active there! STSC (talk) 11:44, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yup :) Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 17:24, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I really admire your good insight into the matter from the ANI. Thanks again. STSC (talk) 05:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Just did as i saw fit :) You are welcome! Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 05:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Please don't be so quick to delete content
I've seen your recent edit on the Qaher-313 article where you deleted the part I wrote on the aircraft's avionics, using a photo taken during the official media event as a reference. First, I cannot find any specific rule that says a photo cannot be used as a reference (you claim it violates the original research policy, but that doesn't policy say anything about using a photo as a reference). Second, if you dislike the reference, please just simply say so (either by adding a tag or using the talk page) instead of just deleting everything.BabyNuke (talk) 07:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Similar content was already added and deleted by editors before you to the very same article. And it will keep getting deleted as by WP:OR, you cannot add your own analysis, and it does not matter how you do it. Unless a reliable source says so, it is original research. I suggest you read that policy properly. Thanks. Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 08:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * If I say the plane is black, provide a photo of the plane as a reference, is it still original research? Or do I need to provide a link to Jane's Defence Weekly and quote their article to satisfy that the plane is indeed black. I see a set of speeds indicated on a photo of an airspeed indicator, and I quote that speed as it is relevant to the article (because the speeds are unrealistic for this type of aircraft). That is not original research, that is an OBSERVATION. And I provide the photo as a reference so anyone can see that that is indeed the case. The same goes for OBSERVING the type of avionics being used. Further, it's curious that the Qahar-313 article contains pure speculation all over the place (for example regarding the engine), but that is okay because it is speculation from a reputable source, but statements on what it is KNOWN to have are not okay because it's based on an observation. The policy does not say a reliable source has to be a written document, instead the words "source material" are used. Anyway I found a reference now that shares my observation, but I still believe you should not delete things without any form of discussion when it is clear to anyone that what is being stated is correct (unless you doubt that what I wrote is correct).BabyNuke (talk) 09:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * You are missing the point: you are not supposed to add your own insight into the article. You surely can add the insight of reputable sources. Also, images can be morphed, and changed in ways that may not be detectable, and may start a hoax, hence they are never reliable sources of information. The source you added is of a blog, but i will let other, more experienced aviation project editors evaluate that. What i did was correct as per WP:BRD. Also, see the following edits and their explanations here and here. Thanks, Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 09:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * There's a big difference between insight and observation. Reading a number on an airspeed indicator is not insight, it's an observation. Yes, photos can be edited, but there's no reason to assume these photos are edited. If we are going to assume the photos are edited then the references used in this article are just as influenced by them and thus also useless, no matter how reputable, because these photos are what the authors use as their reference material as well. As for the blog, TheAviationist.com is used as a reference for this article as well. It's titled: "David Cenciotti's Weblog". Yes, I'm aware that this person is a journalist, however the author of the blog I referenced is (according to his LinkedIn profile) a "Subject Matter Expert (SME) in defence & aerospace industry, focused on procurement programs, defence and security technology and policies. Interested in Modeling, Simulation & Training (MS&T), C4ISR, naval and aerospace systems." - I'd like to think that's enough authority on the subject? The edits you provide as examples aren't comparable.BabyNuke (talk) 10:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * But that difference is important as you cannot use your own insight or observation, but only some expert's observations. Images can be edits, and hence cannot be used as a reliable reference. Period. They only have indicative/supplementary purpose, unless the article itself is about the image. :) And, as i said, i will let other, more experienced editors decide this one. But i do stand by my edit. Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 11:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, the 2 example i had provided are kinda self-explanatory. So... Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 11:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:16, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sudarshan laser-guided bomb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CEP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Shree kshetra audumbar
Sorry, you can't tag a place under A7. That's basically for people, groups of people (companies, etc), named animals (like Gertie the Ninja Aardvark), groups of people doing something (events like The Annual Dancing Hamster Festival in Piddletrenthide), and web content (things you use on their computer, but not software you use on yours). Places and buildings have to be prodded or AfDed if thought non-notable. Peridon (talk) 17:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for informing me! I missed that A7 isn't for places :) Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 17:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

IITs
You might want to take a look at the Indian Institutes of Management article. That table lists official websites and I used that as the basis for changing the IIT table. Personally, I think having these links is useful and not too spammy because these are links to major national colleges and not companies, products or something of that nature BigJolly9 (talk) 12:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I will look into that page as well. It is more of a wiki-policy that official links are only included in the infobox of that organisation's article. Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 13:53, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Or you may use the reference tags in the table. Direct external links in the body are to be avoided as a rule. And in my opinion, it is not much helpful as they are already available in the respective main articles of the institutes. Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 17:43, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:17, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:05, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Security Guard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyderabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:44, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 03:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reservation against Cancellation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Regarding WikiProject:Indian Space Programme
Hello my dear co-editor! Gaurav Pruthi and I have been thinking over starting a WikiProject for the Indian Space Program. If you are interested in taking part in the discussion regarding the WikiProject, please do leave a message here. Regards. Jayadevp13 (talk) 12:00, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Info2012 (talk) 15:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Famous again?
Famous again? See this they are using my image again. Haha they call me an artist, wow! Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 17:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment
Hey Anir1uph; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:49, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:03, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi
I have known ObscureReality(previously Woe90i) for a good amount of time.I never knew he was blocked until I noticed it now.Your warning to him was surely warranted. Cheers  TheStrike  Σagle   14:49, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:51, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)