User talk:Aniracrellim

Speedy deletion of Wayne-Allen-Geis
A tag has been placed on Wayne-Allen-Geis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ARended Winter 21:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

The article Wayne-Allen-Geis has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Please also note that articles must be on notable subjects and should cite to reliable sources which verify their content. Please only repost the article in a form that meets these standards. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  22:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wayne-Allen-Geis
A tag has been placed on Wayne-Allen-Geis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WriterListener (talk) 22:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

BLP
You need to understand our content policies before contributing. Wikipedia is not a soapbox - we publish only what has already been published in reliable sources. For biographies of living persons, our guidelines are particularly stringent, due to the need to be sensitive to what we publish about real people. You need to start from scratch, writing in a neutral tone who this person is, why he is encyclopedic and what makes him controversial. If you're just here to write a piece telling the whole world how evil the guy is... then you're not in the right place. We don't allow attack pieces on Wikipedia. It's an encyclopedia. FCYTravis (talk) 23:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)