User talk:Anirudh.takkar

November 2022
Hello Anirudh.takkar. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anirudh.takkar. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – NJD-DE (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello NJD-DE,
 * Thanks for reviewing the article/edit. I am a beginner in editing/posting to Wikipedia and collected as much information as I can get from the internet regarding the topic. Since I don't have any undisclosed financial stake in promoting this topic, nor do I have any connections to the person. The upload was done purely on the bases of self-interest and acquiring knowledge & experience on 'How to upload on Wikipedia'. In the future, I will keep this in mind to follow the guidelines of Wikipedia. Anirudh.takkar (talk) 06:20, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Riva Arora for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riva Arora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Riva Arora& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:03, 15 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello AngusWOOF,
 * Thanks for taking the time out and reviewing the article.
 * I would like to join the discussion for the deletion or for improving it, as I am new to Wikipedia and it's my first time posting a full independent article on it, it is obvious to make mistakes.
 * Looking forward to hear from you. Anirudh.takkar (talk) 17:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)