User talk:Anish M. Nagpal

May 2018
Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I noticed that in this edit to Chief Minister (India), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:04, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Deputy Chief Minister of Karnataka, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi Anish M. Nagpal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I’m inviting you to join other people who enjoy editing conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where group members can meet new colleagues and get answers to burning questions. I hope to see you there! – Lionel(talk) 05:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Smjg. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Deputy Chief Minister (India). Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Smjg (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of current Indian governors. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adamgerber80 (talk) 22:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

July 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chief Minister (India), you may be blocked from editing. —Gazoth (talk) 13:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Cut/paste moves
Do not make "cut/paste moves" it disrupts the article's history which is required by the licence agreement. Jim1138 (talk) 06:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of current Indian chief ministers. Stop moving pages without prior discussion on the talk page. —Gazoth (talk) 14:22, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Lok Sabha a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 12:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please stop your disruptive cut-and-paste moves. You have been blocked previously for repeatedly doing this.'' -★- PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 12:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Speedy deletion nomination of Janata Dal (Secular) Allaince


A tag has been placed on Janata Dal (Secular) Allaince, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Knightrises10 (talk) 03:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

October
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council and Keshav Prasad Maurya. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4042:228F:C839:0:0:C26:88B0 (talk) 08:47, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm Babymissfortune. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to B. S. Yeddyurappa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Happy holidays~! Baby miss fortune 15:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

The Disappearance of Mr. Boullock moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Disappearance of Mr. Boullock, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 10:04, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Astérix et ses Amis a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  06:53, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr. Boullock&#39;s Disappearance
 The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Andreas Philopater (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC) It would be very helpful if you could add the source from which you derived your information to the article. Otherwise, the unsourced information is likely to be removed. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Anish_M._Nagpal help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

A Knack to Know an Honest Man moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, A Knack to Know an Honest Man, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  PA TH  SL OP U  16:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Stop redirecting and copying without consensus
The Jammu and Kashmir articles are governed by Arbitration Committee. Such massive changes are discussed first at the article talk pages or Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. So please do not make such redirect without a consensus:, , ,. Further, you cannot just copy-paste content further without attributing as that comprises article history, given WP:COPYWITHIN. Tamra vidhir (talk) 08:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jammu and Kasmir (state)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Jammu and Kasmir (state), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tamra vidhir (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Punjab Legislative Council moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Punjab Legislative Council, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:28, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Punjab Legislative Council moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Punjab Legislative Council, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Nagpla, There are no sources in your article to support the content claimed. Please provide at least 3 independent, reliable sources such as from the major newspapers whereby the sources talk about the subject in depth and in length for verification and click the submit button once you have done that.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Basavaraj Horatti


The article Basavaraj Horatti has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Jalen Folf  (talk)  15:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Please put, but don't delete the article Anish M. Nagpal (talk) 04:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied text from Vedic Sanskrit to Vedic Sanskrit grammar (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:38, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:A Knack to Know an Honest Man


Hello, Anish M. Nagpal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "A Knack to Know an Honest Man".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Punjab Legislative Council concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Punjab Legislative Council, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhavishyottara Purana


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Bhavishyottara Purana, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 03:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vishnudharma Purana


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Vishnudharma Purana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 11:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

I wouldn't like it deleted. I prefer you preserve it. I'll surely try to add some more information to the article. Please remove the deletion box. Anish M. Nagpal (talk) 08:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Upapurana, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Garga Samhita and Harivamsha Purana ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Upapurana check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Upapurana?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Brichchhivadharma Purana
Hello, Anish M. Nagpal

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Brichchhivadharma Purana, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Brichchhivadharma Purana.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

I wouldn't like it deleted. I prefer you preserve it. I'll surely try to add some more information to the article. Please remove the deletion box. Anish M. Nagpal (talk) 08:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brihadvishnudharma Purana


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Brihadvishnudharma Purana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The4lines &#124;&#124;&#124;&#124; (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 15:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

I wouldn't like it deleted. I prefer you preserve it. I'll surely try to add some more information to the article. Please remove the deletion box. Anish M. Nagpal (talk) 08:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brihadvishnudharma Purana


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Brihadvishnudharma Purana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HeartGlow30797 (talk) 08:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Brihadvishnudharma Purana
Hello, Anish M. Nagpal

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Brihadvishnudharma Purana, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 5.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 12:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

I wouldn't like it deleted. I prefer you preserve it. I'll surely try to add some more information to the article. Please remove the deletion box. Anish M. Nagpal (talk) 08:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Dharma Purana moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Dharma Purana, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 07:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Hindu texts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mahatmyam ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Hindu_texts check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Hindu_texts?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your attempted DYK nomination of List of Hindu texts
Anish M. Nagpal, thank you for your interest in DYK. I'm afraid that List of Hindu texts does not qualify for DYK due to a number of reasons. First, the article is not new within the past seven days, nor is it newly expanded in that time—the work you did on the article was on May 18, nineteen days prior. That's far too long ago. Second, the article does not achieve the minimum of 1500 prose characters required by all DYK articles—it's only 1045 prose characters. (List sections do not count, only the prose, which here is the top three paragraphs.) Third, since this was not a new article, it would need to be expanded fivefold. In this case, before your edits, the article had 1654 prose characters, so it would need to have expanded to 8270 prose characters, not ended up with fewer characters.

There is information about how the DYK process works and the expectations at WP:DYK, including how to nominate an article, which involves creating a nomination template and transcluding it on the Nominations page. What you did, by adding a new section to the bottom of our Approved page, didn't work at all, and I had to remove the section from that page—you should never need to edit the Approved page. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:03, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Studies in the Upapurāṇas moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Studies in the Upapurāṇas, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 10:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manu (Hinduism), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vira.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kashyapa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marut.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Studies in the Upapurāṇas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Studies in the Upapurāṇas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Studies in the Upapurāṇas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Punjab Legislative Council moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Punjab Legislative Council, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 07:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Punjab Legislative Council moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Punjab Legislative Council, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 07:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Studies in the Upapurāṇas


A tag has been placed on Studies in the Upapurāṇas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles_for_deletion/Studies_in_the_Upapur%C4%81%E1%B9%87as. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 07:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Studies in the Upapurāṇas


A tag has been placed on Studies in the Upapurāṇas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Studies in the Upapurāṇas. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Paul &#10092;talk&#10093; 07:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

2020 Indian State Legislative Council elections moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2020 Indian State Legislative Council elections, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 09:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dharma Purana


Hello, Anish M. Nagpal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dharma Purana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Punjab Legislative Council
Hello, Anish M. Nagpal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Punjab Legislative Council, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2020 Indian State Legislative Council elections and nominations
Hello, Anish M. Nagpal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2020 Indian State Legislative Council elections and nominations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Punjab Legislative Council


Hello, Anish M. Nagpal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Punjab Legislative Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)