User talk:Anittas/ArchiveV

Raise Up
Bucharest snobbery is an excellent article by the way. They will learn to appreciate it. Alexander 007 19:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Then why put it for deletion? --Candide, or Optimism 22:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Nevermind my last email, I think I was under the influence of cough syrup. Alexander 007 16:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * But it does look like a cat's tail. Alexander 007 16:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what email you're talking about. Is it the one where you said that you had to restore the Deletion tag because of policy? If so, it's cool. --Candide, or Optimism 16:38, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Talking behind other people's backs
Anittas, I didn't talk behind your back at all. The very fact that you saw my comment to Oleg and responded to it means that it was very much public. Secondly, I've written to you countless times telling you how I feel about your edits. As to giving you many chances - it wasn't only me that did so, but many other admins, in the RfC. I'm not saying you asked for mercy, just that everytime when you made personal attacks, there was a great deal of negotiation, commenting and stuff like that, but never blocking (except for the 24h block by FeloniousMonk). I was simply making a point that Bonaparte got none of that, which isn't fair. There was never really an attempt by the community to try and solve the things he was doing and make him understand that what he was doing was wrong. In your case, it was different. And perhaps successful. Ronline ✉ 22:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the picture dispute
Knock it off or I'll ban you myself.--Jimbo Wales 23:30, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Knock what off? The talking about the dispute, or what? --Candide, or Optimism 23:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Just be good, ok?--Jimbo Wales 23:37, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I am good, but okay. --Candide, or Optimism 23:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Battle of Vaslui
Anittas, the picture you posted for the article ("Moldavian troops fighting etc.") screams copyvio (we all know the book). Besides that, it is tacky and of no informative value. Dahn 18:01, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Anittas maybe you can use the image of the pre WWII Romanian enciclopedia (the copyright seem expired and the images from this enciclopediara are already published as thumbnail by tricolorul newspaper). USer User talk:Dpotop can help you.CristianChirita One Valuable source can be "Sefan cel mare glorios comandant de osti.1457 1504 album 58 de foi. publicat in 1957 As complete reference you can see: http://www.bnrm.md/publicatii/files/2/1.pdf
 * Where is this encyclopedia? Does it have images of the battle? --Candide, or Optimism 19:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

"Are you a specialist in copyright law? If yes, I would like to know whether "Enciclopedia Romaniei" edited by D. Gusti in the late 1930s and beginning of 1940s is now in public domain. I have it, I have a scanner and OCR software, and I think that it contains loads of meaningful info. I just don't know whether it's OK to publish it." As I've allready say User talk:Dpotopcan help you.CristianChirita
 * I will contact Dpotop. Also, if you will, please sign your comments. It makes things so much easier. Thanks for the info. The timeline on Stefan will be useful. --Candide, or Optimism 20:10, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Also if you know some latin, besides a beautiful Iancu de Hunedoara picture in armour, I suppose that you can find some illustration for Baia Battle here at http://www.caslin.sk/htdoc/diglib/chrohung/gallery.htm CristianChirita 20:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't speak any Latin at all, but what's page number for the picture? --Candide, or Optimism 20:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

I have no ideea, I know only the year of the chronicle 1488, it a great probability to be there... I suppose that Iancu de Hunedoara si folio 122, Matei Corvin Foliation: 137r, Constantinopol 130, But please see the flag in the folio "Foliation: 117v" It is amazing Hungarian against Moldovans:-) in a book written in 1488 http://www.caslin.sk/htdoc/diglib/chrohung/high/0117v.jpgCristianChirita

WikiProject Military history: Coordinator elections
--Loopy e 05:15, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: Coordinators
Thanks for the comment - I'll be sure to get more detail put into the role descriptions, added either by me or Kirill Lokshin by tomorrow. As for running for it, I don't really feel like going for the Lead, but I might put myself up for an Assistant. Cheers --Loopy e 07:17, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

1,950,000 hits
Alexander 007 gets 1,950,000 hits on a 0.21 second google search. Anittas gets 12,600. Does any Wikipedian get more hits than me and at the same time have his User Page come up as the first result? :) Alexander 007 20:22, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * But if you use quotations, my nick gets more hits :D Bogdangiusca gets more hits than both of us. Weird... --Candide, or Optimism 20:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Bla bla. I get more hits than both of you combined, forget about quotes. Search through all 1.9 million hits... Alexander 007 20:35, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * That's because the name itself is more popular. Besides, I'll rather be unique than popular ;) --Candide, or Optimism 20:38, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No, there is only one Alexander 007. There are a few other Alex 007's, but there is no other Alexander 007 on the net. Link one. By the way, if you press "show all omitted results", my quotes come up.Alexander 007 20:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * http://www.google.com/search?q=Alexander+007&hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&start=40&sa=N&filter=0 LOL! --Candide, or Optimism 20:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Those are my accounts. Click on them. Alexander 007 20:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, five pages of almost 2 million hits. Now google my real name, but keep it to your self. :p --Candide, or Optimism 20:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * 51 hits, various. Didn't see one that had the entire name in one result. Or did you mean just your first name? Alexander 007 21:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, let me email you. --Candide, or Optimism

21:05, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I still got 1,950,000 hits, baby. The quotes will multiply. Alexander 007 21:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Look, they've already multiplied:. Alexander 007 22:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Dude, either you're joking or don't know how Google works. After page 20, you will see that you get results other than your nickname; then after page 35, most are of other people. Either way, it doesn't matter. lol --Candide, or Optimism 22:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Obviously, I'm fucking wih you. But 20 pages is better than 5. And multiplying... Alexander 007 22:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I take fuck seriously. :p --Candide, or Optimism 23:35, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Heheh. I get 2,200,000. But that's cause I'm a word in German. And one in Korean. Dahn 11:08, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * To the best of my knowledge, you're not a word in German – unless you consider "Themse" a word in English, as opposed to a proper name. Either way, there's a city called Dahn in Germany, and it's a surname, but that's about it. &mdash; Nightstallion (?) 12:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Well, I know no German. That's not why I picked the name. Thanks for the info, btw. I hit google and "I" kept popping up on sites in German. Since they capitalize every second word, I really couldn't tell if I was a place or a verb or a noun or a numeral (no, this much I knew)... Dahn 12:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I got 2,200,000 hits at the time after my timestamp. Google. Alexander 007 01:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Copyright law
Hi Anittas, you asked me a question about Romanian copyright law. Unfortunately, I'm not an expert, and was actually asking for advise on the matter. And the advise cam from User:CristianChirita, you can see his reply on my web page. I will take that infor for granted, in order to digitize and use large fragments of the "Enciclopedia Romanilor" de Dimitrie Gusti.Dpotop 12:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I also read the copyright law of 1956, which is the one under which "Enciclopedia Romaniei" entered public domain. Where is your picture taken from? Recall that it is important which edition you are copying from. For instance, even if the work of Eminescu is public domain, the last edition from Humanitas is not. So, you are allowed to copy from the original versions, but not the recent editions. Dpotop 12:57, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I scanned the image from a book called "Povestiri Istorice - Partea I" from 1987. If that isn't allowed, can we use your picture? --Candide, or Optimism 18:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * If it's in the encyclopedia, I can scan it, but I need some time (I'll have to ask my parents to do it :) ). Dpotop 19:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Mateo poate? Nu sunt prea sigur.Constantzeanu 00:39, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok, I searched for this image some time ago, but I didn find it. I forgot to tell you, and I am sorry for this. Dpotop 07:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Warning
You've been warned about personal attacks and disruption many times before, most recently by Jimbo I see. If you continue with this sort of disruption and personal attack, you will again find yourself on WP:AN/I and all that that will entail this time around. FeloniousMonk


 * You really shouldn't lead new users down the same path you have chosen. It isn't often that I see Jimbo threaten to ban people.  Guettarda 19:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Warning 2
Removing Warnings from your talk page is considered Vandalism. Please see WP:Vandalism.

Thanks,

Sebastian Kessel Talk 20:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * What is says is that "removing vandalism warnings from one's talk page is also considered vandalism", but I was not warned for vandalism. Also, I don't recognize the warning as accurate. I have the right to say when I think that an admin uses their tools in the wrong way. --Candide, or Optimism 20:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I replied in WP:ANI. You might be right in your assesment. Sebastian Kessel Talk 20:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It's cool. --Candide, or Optimism 20:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Warning 3
There is no serious reason to put yourself in danger of being banned. mikka (t) 23:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Huh? --Candide, or Optimism 00:44, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

non-GFDL material
Hi - I've marked Prosocial behavior as a copyvio, from http://www.learningtogive.org/papers/index.asp?bpid=52. Text that is restricted for non-commercial use cannot be included in Wikipedia, please see Copyrights. -- Rick Block (talk) 14:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know, they told me. I was going to change that. You could have changed it, instead, by writing a short stub. --Candide, or Optimism 21:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * If you want, you can write a stub (follow the link to the temporary page). I encourage you to do this, and apologize for the bluntness of the copyvio notice.  I know nothing about this topic, so can't really help.  -- Rick Block (talk) 02:15, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Question on comment
Tell me, you've been called for calling someone a who was a Jew a "JEW". How grave do you think the edit summary here is? Is it that bad, should I start an RfC? Latinus 22:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know anything about the conflict and I called someone who was a Jew, a Jew, on a talkpage. That guy changed the article and I don't know whether his changes are accurate, POV, or whatever. In addition to that, he is an anonymous editor, so starting a RfC against someone who cannot be identified can be a little tricky. --Candide, or Optimism 22:26, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm joking, man! Latinus 22:29, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh! Hehe. --Candide, or Optimism 22:41, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
I would like to thank you for your support for my candidacy for the Military history WikiProject coordinator position. I am now the Lead Coordinator, and I intend to do my best to continue improving the project. If you ever have any questions or concerns regarding my actions, or simply new ideas for the project, be sure to let me know! —Kirill Lok s hin 00:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Cheers
I don't wanna overdo it or anything, so here's just a brief note thanking you for supporting me in the WikiProject Military history coordinator elections. Cheers, and I hope I can please as Assistant Coordinator! --Loopy e 01:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Published
You wrote on Jimbo's talkpage that you have published work of your own. Was it literature? --Candide, or Optimism 05:29, 6 February 2006 (UTC)


 * No. I've written a few decent short stories, but none were published in anything more prestigious than a student magazine or a chapbook. I self-published a book of songs in 1978, but it was basically a publicity thing as a performer: at that point, one could just churn out a demo CD the way one can now. While I was a grad student I did a bunch of writing for a long-forgotten second-rate encyclopedia  whose name I honestly cannot recall. I've published a good deal of technical writing (usually uncredited, because it was work for hire, but most recently including several hundred reference and conceptual topics for Microsoft), a moderate amount of travel writing (I ghost-wrote a good hunk of two Peter Verstappen travel guides to the U.S. back in the late 1970s, and have contributed on and off to TravelSmart); I've had a significant editorial role on several books (most notably The Infamous Boundary : Seven decades of controversy in quantum physics by David Wick) and there are probably a few things I'm not thinking of, because writing really hasn't been my career focus for the last 25 years, computers have. Which is to say, I am not primarily a writer, but I have a lot more first-hand experience in the publishing world than most of the people working here, and when you add that to being the son of a (now deceased) publisher and having at least a dozen friends who do make their living (or a substantial part of their living) as writers, it means I'm pretty exposed to that world. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Cool. That means you also worked as a freelance writer. What kind work did you do for the book about Quantom Physics? I'm just curious. --Candide, or Optimism 06:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I read the first (or maybe second) draft, made extensive suggestions (including chopping entire chapters and adding others), and spent at a couple of afternoons with Dave specifically helping him focus what exactly he was trying to do with the book (which we had discussed on and off from the time that he first conceived it). I was pretty typical of his intended audience (scientifiaclly literate, but by no means a physicist. This was one of a few times that I've helped hard-science people work out how to get key concepts across to a lay or semi-lay audience; I once spent the better part of a weekend&mdash;sort of an unofficial ten-year college reunion&mdash;functioning as intermediary between a group of physicists doing chaos theory and a contingent of philosophy professors, and I've had two jobs in which I was the liaison between medical personnel and computer professionals building medical records software). - Jmabel | Talk 06:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It all sounds very brainy. What is it that you do in Ro, then? I'm guessing you work as some kind of freelance consultant. --Candide, or Optimism 13:30, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Tara Rumaneasca 1390
in the 1390 treaty with poland, mircea was called Woyvoda Transalpinus, Fogaras et Omlas dux, seurinii comes, terrarum Dobrotici despotus et Tristri dominus. Omlas, Fagaras and Severin were feuds given by the hungarian king to mircea. in the hrisov of 1387, he mentions along his possesions къ Татарскым странами (hope i got it right), translated by most romanian historians as părţile tătăreşti ("tatar parts"). probably this was reffering to territories in southern moldavia, bessarabia and, maybe, northern dobruja. iorga said tht he found a map of wallachia from 1780 that shown besarabia proper (today's bugeac) as part of wallachia. from what i know, hungary never ruled bessarabia after year 1000 (hungarian tribes probably lived in the region before migrating to pannonia). i think you're talking about the port of killia, which was indeed ruled for some time in the 15th century by hungary and wallachia. the border is almost a straight line because nobody knows how much of moldavia did mircea rule. the border on the map is based on Petre Dan's description in Hotarele românismului în date (Litera International, Chişinău, ISBN 973-675-278-X -- ISBN 9975-74-902-X) "Sud Cetatea Albă, Nord Cahul, Nord Tecuci, Sud Pasul Oituz" (south of Cetatea Alba, north of Cahul, north of Tecuci, south of Oituz mountain pass. Anonimu 17:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Latcu
Nu stiu. Eu am acum in fata cartea '''M. Barbulescu, D. Deletant, K. Hitchins, S. Papacostea, P. Teodor - Istoria Romaniei. Ed. Corint, 2004, ISBN 973-653-514-2'''. Tinand cont ca doi autori sunt straini (un englez si un american), am mai multa incredere sa public informatia aici.Dpotop 19:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Nu, cartea e in romana. Dar cei doi autori sunt specializati (cred) si in istoria Romaniei, si de aceea au trebuit sa invete engleza (sau le-a tradus cineva textul). Sorry, dar nu am referinta in engleza. :(. Dpotop 19:57, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Cartea e bunicica. Are o gramada de date, intr-un volum nu foarte mare (500 de pagini). Textul de care vorbesc eu e la pagina 132. Dpotop 19:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Uitasem: pretul e de 25 RON, dar daca nu iti place, sa nu ma injuri. :) Dpotop 20:00, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks
You've been warned previously about personal attacks and stirring up trouble by trying to get others to do the dirty work you've been unable to do yourself. I see that they've had no effect: Again, Jimbo warned you about this behavior already:  You need to knock it off. FeloniousMonk 16:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I have the right to say that I think that you abuse your tools. I also think that they should block you. I have the right to complain. As for Jimbo: he warned me for a different thing. You can't use that against me whenever you feel like warning me. I also think you should apologize for implying on ANI that I am a vadal. --Candide, or Optimism 17:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Jimbo's warnings to you  was over the stink you made on the WikiEN-l mailing list over my blocking of you:  His warning is indeed directly related to this discussion now.


 * I'm sorry that you found my blocking of you so distressing that you now must campaign around the project to seek my removal as an admin.  But your subsequent actions are coming dangerously close to harassment. If I'm as abusive of my position as you're claiming, I'd think you'd not want to not provoke me, there's no telling what I might do! That is unless your goal is simply to harass. FeloniousMonk 18:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * My goal is to inform others of potential danger. This kind of altruism can be observed in nature, such as birds warning other birds of pray animals. --Candide, or Optimism 18:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * So you intend to continue this campaign? FeloniousMonk 18:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't call it a campaign, but if I smell abuse, then yes. --Candide, or Optimism 18:39, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Caffa & Theodoro
Hi.

1) About maps. Unfortunately there are no good maps on Crimean history on the web. There is... m-m-m... not map - only a scheme, I've made just now. It shows the situation in Crimea before the Ottoman invasion in 1475. http://www.ljplus.ru/img/d/o/don_alessandro/Theodoro_and_Caffa.PNG

red - Genoesian colonies, green - the Principality of Theodoro, blue - the Khanate of Crimea (Haci Giray).

Kalamita = today's Inkerman, Cembalo = Balaklava, Aluston = Alushta, Theodoro = Mangup, Soldaia = Sudak, Caffa = Theodosia, Solkhat = Stary Krym, Vosporo = Kerch.

If you want more information on Crimen history, I'll try to answer.

2) About Stephen III the Great and his relationships with Theodoro.

I know really few facts. Stephen married Maria Gabras - the dauther of Prince of Theodoro. The House of Gabras was related both to the Comnenian dynasty and to the Palaeologan dynasty and by that time Stephen was a great success in his war against the Ottomans. So this marrige gave him rigths to clame the throne of Constantinople (if he would win Constantinople from the Turks). Alexander Gabras was Maria's brother, and Isaac was their uncle. Sthephen wanted to create a coalition against the Ottomans - Moldavia, Theodoro and Caffa. But Isaac Gabras was very pro-Ottoman ruler. So he call Alexander, who lived in Moldavia in exile, gave him 300 men and a ship and sent to Crimea. Alexander was a success - he replaced Isaac on the throne of Theodoro. But in 1475 Ottoman general Gedik Ahmet Paşa conquered both Caffa and Theodoro. Caffa capitulated immedeatly, but Theodoro under Prince Alexander opposed the Ottmomans for half of a year. Alexander was enslaved and died in prison in Istanbul in spite of the attempts of Stephen to liberate him.

3) Please, excuse my awfull English.

Don Alessandro 19:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Great info on Alexander, but where did you find these sources? I might need them for the Moldavian articles. Your map looks good, tho I can't speak for it's accuracy. You should upload it to the article. Do you know why Stephen didn't annex Theodoro? Could he annex the land at all? Thanks. --Candide, or Optimism 19:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Be careful !
Bai, fi atent, ca dobitocii astia vor sa ne stearga tag-urile care spun ca suntem in favoarea unificarii Romania-Moldova, pentru ca vasazaica sunt "polemice si inflamatorii" ! Gimme a friggin' break ! Sa nu cumva sa-i lasi sa-ti modifice pagina, daca it-i vor scoate elemente din, ea, sa le pui la loc. Am sa transmit mesajul si la ceilalti Romani. Bafta. -Voievod 18:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Sa'd al-Din
Unfortunately I have no knowledge of English translations. It is quite possible that it was not especially interestion, since first, it was based on other known sources; second, it was written in a rather poetic prose mixed with verse, i.e., what would be called today propaganda. Of course, it is my opinion only, and I may be mistaken. Sorry that I was of no help. Mukadderat 10:00, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

My photos
Hi Anittas, I'm trying to sell my photos online at www.photos.flagstaffotos.com

I think if you have only one photo you are thinking of, you'd probably be better of trying to sell it at a local gallery. Some photographic sites may allow you to sell as part of their domain tho. Hope that helps a little! --Fir0002 style="color:#C6CACC; background:#F8FCFF">www 05:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Not sure if interested
and also not sure if you haven't already seen it: as I've got Bogdan's talk page in my watch list, I've noticed the message you left him about an article posted on a board you're on; http://www.serbianna.com/columns/deliso/ Here you've got a link to a little info on that guy & some other (maybe similar articles) he wrote. Cheers! --Vlad 17:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, perhaps in the future, those articles will serve some different purpose. --Candide, or Optimism 23:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

"Get High..."
It's a username that promotes illegal activities and can be seen as an invitation to vandalize the site. Also closely resembles the disruptive "let's vandalize wikipedia" and "let's fuck and rape admins" accounts which are typically blocked automatically within seconds of creation. Basically I'd block anything that started with "Let's" on general principal, because it's probably another sockpuppet of the same select few individuals. — Mar. 5, '06 [07:00] 

On the contary
There might be some liability for Wikipedia if it is seen to be promoting illegal activities but I'm no expert on the subject, this post was just a point of view that you might have not considered -- Tawker 08:14, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * One is allowed to say that they like drugs. Just look at all the hip-hop music. That admin abused his tools. --Candide, or Optimism 08:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I misread the reason for the block, the username follows almost perfectly a pattern for vandalizing usernames, if I had a computer program that would look for suspicious usernames 99.9% of the time something like that would be caught and most likely blocked. -- Tawker 08:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Bonaparte's userpage
I am second to think that Bonaparte's userpage should be left with Bonaparte's design, not somebody else's (with the exception of the indefinedblocked message. If you want I could protect the page in your version. abakharev 13:02, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Text of the chronicle
You can find the complete text with the images if you have the DJVU plugin. It is the facsimile of the chronicle.http://www.wbc.poznan.pl/dlibra/docmetadata?id=1513&from=metadatasearch&dirids=1 there are three incons in the top of the page.

Thanks for the compliments
On the Târgul Frumos article. Glad you like it. Have a good day. Andreas 21:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. :) --Candide, or Optimism 21:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Despre ceva foarte interesant...
Anittas, nu sunt sigur daca tu deja sti sau nu, dar oricum, Mo Wiki a avut o alegere despre viiroul (daca acest wiki va continua sau nu), si din fericire, a fost multi romani (si din Romania, si din moldova) acolo care a avut habar si deci a votat impotriva projectul initiat de un american care nu stie limba. Bineinteles, el a inceput sa planga ca alegera n-a fost valabil, pentru ca a fost deschis doar pentru utilizatori care stie limba romana/"moldoveneasca", si vrea sa opreste procesul care deja a suspendat projectul lui care este jignitor pentru multi romani. Totusi, se pare ca sfarsitul Mo wiki se aproape, si stirile trebuie sa fi intr-adevar binevenite pentru tine. Daca si tu vrei sa particip la discutia actuala, am un link aici:

http://mo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Rezultat_alegeri

Anclation 11:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Am mai auzit cate ceva de la Bonny, dar in ultimul timp nu am prea auzit multe. Multumesc pentru nautatile bune. Sa-mi spui cand au inchiso pe definitiv. --Candide, or Optimism 11:29, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Battle of Vaslui
The military history peer review is basically ready to be used; if you'd like to submit the article there, it would be quite appreciated ;-) —Kirill Lok s hin 22:27, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Please help
Hi Anittas- I tried unsuccessfully to change the title to "Republic of Moldavia wine." Perhaps you have more computer skill than I and can make the change. Also, please correct any errors you find in the article. Many thanks for your help.David Justin 19:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)