User talk:Anj 24

Anj 24, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

February 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Baaghi: Rebels in Love has been reverted. Your edit here to Baaghi: Rebels in Love was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://www.bollywoodlife.com/news-gossip/shraddha-kapoor-on-baaghi-our-film-is-not-a-remake-of-the-one-starring-salman-khan/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Anj 24. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Sasha Chettri, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉  06:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Movie_release_date_announcement.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Movie_release_date_announcement.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CAPTAIN MEDUSA  talk  11:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Roy kapur films
Hello Anj 24,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username The9Man and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Roy kapur films for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Roy Kapur Films.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

The9Man &#124; (talk) 08:11, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Anj 24. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Rising Sun Films, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. signed,Rosguill talk 02:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

"Vinod Bhanushali is the President Marketing Of Media & Promotions for the movie."
Re: this and this and similar, where you keep adding content about Vinod Bhanushali being "President Marketing Of Media & Promotions", this is meaningless content that doesn't belong in film articles. There are zero quality film articles where anybody has drawn extra attention to whomever did the marketing. Stop adding it, please. Also, nobody cares who the co-producers are, so please stop adding that as well. It looks to me like you're here to promote yourself, and if that's the case, it won't be tolerated and you will very quickly wind up with your editing privileges interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:21, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

About Draft:Roy Kapur Films
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Roy Kapur Films a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Roy Kapur Films. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you.  NonsensicalSystem (err0r?)(.log) 12:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Siddharth Roy Kapur, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Siddharth Roy Kapur. ''Do not remove sourced content. And why are you adding invalid templates? Discuss in the article talk page if necessary. We already have a section there.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits at Siddharth Roy Kapur. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Siddharth Roy Kapur, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not remove sourced content and maintenance templates. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Your last batch of edits here, where you inexplicably deleted maintenance templates, and restored inappropriate POV fluff that you've submitted multiple times, coupled with your failure to explain your edits or engage in discussion about them, suggests to me that you're not actually here to build a neutral encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kino Works


Hello, Anj 24. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kino Works".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Roy Kapur Films
Hello, Anj 24. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roy Kapur Films, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Roy Kapur Films


Hello, Anj 24. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roy Kapur Films".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Siddharth Roy Kapur 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Siddharth Roy Kapur 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 03:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)