User talk:Anjaankarthik007

Anjaankarthik007, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Xx Cool Guy7202 xX (talk) 22:13, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Subjective POV fluff
Edits like this are problematic not only because you are changing financial figures without providing any new references, which looks an awful lot like vandalism, but also because you're introducing subjective POV fluff. Subjective adjectives like "huge", "chartbuster", "blockbuster", super hit, flop etc don't belong in articles. We don't report one site's opinion as an incontrovertible fact. If someone "declared" a film "a giant piece of crap", would you think that was appropriate for inclusion? Same thing. One site's opinion constitutes undue weight given to their voice. Wikipedia is not a trade rag and we are not here to promote films. Our content must be presented in a professional, neutral point of view. Please stop submitting this problematic content. Also this edit is clearly disruptive because you've changed the financial values without adding new references, and you've ignored a glaringly obvious note instructing you to not remove the Estimation template. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)