User talk:Anjidani

Welcome!

Hello, Anjidani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as KingsEra, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY  13:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of KingsEra


A tag has been placed on KingsEra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY  13:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, a number of your recent file uploads, such as KingsEra, have been missing information regarding their copyright status. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and that the copyright status of all media files uploaded to Wikipedia must be verifiable by others. If you have questions regarding copyright on Wikipedia, they can be raised at the copyright question page. Thank you. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 13:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at KingsEra
Hi there Anjidani! I saw that you added a hangon tag to a page which you created, KingsEra. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD G11. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:KingsEra, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

deletion
Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~
 * I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines. The only references were not independent, and there is no indication how this game is notable, especially when it's experimental
 * All the images were licensed as "own work", when the are clearly copied from the game website, which claims copyright
 * It's written like an advert,
 * all occurrences of Kings Era (not just the first) and TS information Technology are bolded
 * The winner will be the hero and your name will be forever on the inscription recorded as an immortal hero, also you earn Cash prizes !! in final levels of the game. &mdash; spam

The copyright infringements, lack of notability and references, and spamminess means this article is not acceptable  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

--

My descriptions
Hi, First thanks for your fast reply, but about my article:

1- you said I did not provide independent verifiable sources about our game. but if you check the aricle about other games, you will see the only reference is their official website. and our Game project is new and we don't have any strong references for it. but I can prove any document that you need to verify my article.

maybe the best way to verify a game is playing it.

2- all of images was screen shot of the our game. and all of them designed by our team. therefore I was licensed them as "own work". if this is wrong, what should I select ?

3- I wrote all kingsera bolded because it is name of the game and I see this style in other articles in wikipedia. and bout the type of some sentence like that one, I tried to write some sentence in historical and heroic form because our game is a historical game.

I checked many of article in wikipedia about games and thay are very similar to structure of my article and I am confused why that articles are still active and my article deleted.

Please assist me to publish my article. I am ready to provide any document that you need.

Regard

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:11, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

More

 * 1) The fact that other articles have slipped through the net is an argument for deleting them too, it doesn't help your case, which I'll assess on its own merits.
 * 2) I don't doubt that the game exists, it may be brilliant for all I know, but that's not the point; you need independent verifiable sources to show why it's notable. "our Game project is new" suggests that at the moment it's just another game. these are top class articles; I'm not saying you can reproduce that standard, but it's what you should aspire to.
 * 3) The website claims copyright. If you own the copyright to the images, we need to verify that. Please send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article talk page.
 * 4) Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the images under the GFDL or into the public domain, and then leave a note  at the article talk page with a link to the web page details.
 * 5) Only the first mention of the article title (and nothing else) should be in bold.
 * 6) I tried to write some sentence in historical and heroic form because our game is a historical game. &mdash; better to stick with encyclopaedic and neutral

I'm not unsympathetic, and I've helped editors recreate pages in an acceptable form. I think the stumbling block here is that it's a new free game, no track record, no independent sources. May be best to wait until you have proper sources to establish notability  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  14:07, 4 December 2010 (UTC)