User talk:Anjuliyoung

Chick embryo
I have taken some time to clean up your Chick embryo article, including adding appropriate wikilinks, and removal of language that is not of the appropriate tone for an encyclopedia. However, there are still some significant issues to be resolved: There are hints of sources in the various parenthetical attributions, and there were hints of more material to come (perhaps you are working on this collaboratively with some other editors?). If the plan is to develop the article incrementally over several days or weeks, might I suggest you do so in your user space instead -- say at User:Anjuliyoung/Chick embryo? I would also suggest a different title for the article, something along the lines of Chicken as scientific research model to more properly reflect the subject of the article. If you would like any help with any of these changes, feel free to ask! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) The article cites no sources.
 * 2) The article is incomplete.

Proposed deletion of Chick embryo


The article Chick embryo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The author has created a copy at User:Anjuliyoung/Chick embryo to complete work on the page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:15, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Full citations, please
The citation list for Chick embryo currently reads as: Clearly, these citations are insufficient for an independent editor to look up to verify the information you have included. Please provide full citations, with author names, publication names, URLs if the material is available online, etc. (I.e. sufficient information for someone else to know what you're talking about.) WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Murphy, 1914a; Murphy, 1914b
 * 2) Levi-Montalcini, 1952
 * 3) Stehelin et al., 1976a; Stehelin et al., 1976b
 * 4) Rous, 1918
 * 5) Bader et al., 2006
 * 6) Murphy and Rous, 1912
 * 7) Dagg et al., 1954
 * 8) Easty et al., 1969
 * 9) Nicolson et al., 1978
 * 10) Ossowski and Reich, 1983
 * 11) Eliceiri et al., 1998
 * 12) Chambers et al., 1982
 * 13) Gordon and Quigley, 1986
 * 14) Chambers et al., 1998
 * 15) Zijlstra et al., 2002
 * 16) Zijlstra et al., 2002
 * 17) Wong et al., 2004
 * Good start on clearing up those citations. More work is needed.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Article name
I have pointed out before that I believe the title of your Chick embryo article is inappropriate, as the article has a very specific topic regarding research involving chickens (both embryonic and full-grown). Please add your thoughts to the discussion going on at Talk:Chick embryo. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

I think he article name should remain chick embryo because, while there is information about chickens, it is merely here to add perspective. The main focus of he article is the chick embryo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.168.7.23 (talk) 13:26, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Please address your comments at Talk:Chick embryo so that others involved in the conversation may see them. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Timeline
You probably worked really hard creating this. Unfortunately, that's a rather poor method of conveying information at Wikipedia. I have converted the information to a standard Wikipedia table instead. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank You! This is my first wikipedia page (as you could probably tell) and I really appreciate the help.
 * Glad to help. You'll notice that the references spelled out in the table need to be fully expanded.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Chicken as biological research model
Hello Anjuliyoung. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chicken as biological research model, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Creator was not the only editor of this page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:57, 6 February 2013 (UTC)