User talk:Ankit Atr

Speedy deletion nomination of Ankit's Integer Square theory


A tag has been placed on Ankit's Integer Square theory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Empire3131 (talk) 18:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hi Ankit Atr, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Guidance for younger editors and On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 04:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

-- Amanda  (aka DQ) 04:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

also
I'm sorry to tell you this, but I've read your 'integer square theory', and there's nothing particularly new about it. It's impressive that you deduced it yourself, but it's a fairly elementary application of number theory. DS (talk) 04:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)