User talk:Ankitcktd

The article Shriv ComMedia Solutions has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Malware. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 10:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Google Chrome do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 17:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Communal violence prevention bill


A tag has been placed on Communal violence prevention bill, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ahunt (talk) 17:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Customer relationship management with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 05:26, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Animation. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 10:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

http://spam.commediait.com
Please do not add any links to commediait.com to Wikipedia articles. If you believe that the site is a legitimate reference per Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources, please discuss it at the reliable sources notice board. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 10:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Consumer relationship system, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. bonadea contributions talk 10:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Question before anyone considers unblocking: So far, Ankitcktd, it looks to me like every or nearly edit you've made to Wikipedia has been to add some form of spam link. What do you plan to do on Wikipedia if unblocked, since you are now aware that this behavior is unacceptable? Qwyrxian (talk) 05:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)