User talk:Ankuljoshi

Welcome!
Hi there,

I've moved the article you started at Modelling of a non-ideal Plug Flow Reactor to Non-ideal plug flow reactor model, because that's a more natural name for the article, and because it matches the title of the main article at Plug flow reactor model. I've also suggested that the material you're writing should rather be merged into that article: I don't think it's currently worth it to have a separate article on non-ideal models: I think it's better to cover the whole topic in one place, unless the text becomes unmanageably long.

In general, I also think you're putting too much of the detail of the derivation into the article - in this case, it's OK to explain the basic principles and then give the result as reported in standard texts.

Are you aware of the Chem. Eng. WikiProject? You might like to see what's going on there.

I hope you enjoy it here at Wikipedia: if you ever feel unwelcome or unsure of how to go about editing, please leave a note on my talk page. --Slashme (talk) 21:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Your addition to Non-ideal plug flow reactor model has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''I deleted a section from this article, because it had been copied word-for-word, either from http://mx.nthu.edu.tw/~cchu/course/acrk/chapter7.pdf or an identical source. See [this edit. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-ideal_plug_flow_reactor_model&diff=713785823&oldid=713785217] '' Slashme (talk) 21:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Non-ideal plug flow reactor model


A tag has been placed on Non-ideal plug flow reactor model requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242409630_Mathematical_Modeling_and_Simulation_of_a_Non-Ideal_Plug_Flow_Reactor_in_a_Saponification_Pilot_Plant. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Slashme (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Deletion request
Hi again.

Sorry to do this to you, but I've just realised that much of the text of that article comes from a paper, possibly one that you wrote. Because it's not clear to me that the material is free, I'm erring on the side of caution and requesting that an administrator remove the article for now.

Maybe it would be worthwhile for you to merge the key aspects of the analysis of non-ideal PFRs into the main article that I linked to. If you do this, however, please be especially careful of copyright infringements: only copy from free sources, and if you do, please also cite them fully. --Slashme (talk) 22:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)