User talk:Ankur5584

Speedy deletion of Vivek Randive
A tag has been placed on Vivek Randive requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. StewieGriffin!  &bull; Talk 06:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

speedy deletion...
I saw you recently had an article you started nominated for speedy deletion, and that the justification offered was that it lacked an explicit assertion of notability. Your nominator recently nominated an article I recently started for speedy deletion.

We are all volunteers here. I was very unhappy with the way this particular volunteer performed their volunteer quality control inspections.

In the case of the article I started they applied an obviously inappropriate tag.

They applied the speedy deletion tag just one minute after it was created -- which does not comply with the wikipedia's deletion policies.

And they proved unwilling to consider the possibility they may have made a mistake.

Since then I have seen from their User pages that they are a teenager (born in the 1990s the page says...). I don't have a problem with that. I don't have a problem with interacting with a teenager, even a very young teenager, as an equal -- provided they are willing to assume adult responsibilities.

Anyhow, if you want to ask the deleting administrator to get articles you started "userified", drop me a line, and I will take a look at them, and let you know if there are hints I can offer that would help them survive a deletion review.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 20:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)