User talk:Anlp

Welcome!
Hello, Anlp, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 03:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

March 2017
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Miss Grand International, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Miss Grand International, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Miss Grand International, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 03:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Miss Grand International ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 03:55, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Miss Grand International. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  03:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Please note that Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. As further information, please see What Wikipedia is not and Verifiability. Wikipedia is not a forum, blog, soapbox, fan site or advice site. It is an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not publish personal opinions, commentary, advocacy or unsourced information likely to be changed, challenged or disputed. Sourced information cannot be removed without a valid reason or other source showing it is wrong or off topic. See also Biographies of living persons, Five Pillars, Identifying reliable sources, Citing sources, Help:Footnotes, No original research, Words to watch and Neutral point of view. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Referencing for beginners; Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Simplified ruleset; and Simplified Manual of Style. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 04:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Just a little heads up, please don't copy text from other sites and paste here. Its very much against wikipedia rules. WP:COPYVIO LionMans Account (talk) 15:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)