User talk:Ann Lucenko/sandbox

Review #1 Hi, Perhaps in your intro instead of discussing the connectivity of the atoms in your molecule you could instead find a picture of it and put it in the chem box.Also, later on you say that your element is 'incompatable' with water,...perhaps you could say why (although i think you already mentioned that in the previous sentence),...combustible, insoluble, whatever,...incompatible is kind of a vague word

Group7 reactorgo (talk) 18:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Review #2 Add a picture of the chemical, either by finding one online or by using software such as chemdraw. Also remove the explanation about density. You say that the compound would sink to the bottom of the water, yet you later explain that the compound reacts violently with water, so you should draw out this reaction and show what products form. Also all compounds have a melting point and so saying "its a liquid at 25" degrees C" is not acceptable.

Tmcgreg2 (talk) 06:22, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Review #3 Overall, the page is nicely organized, and you have a really detailed chembox. However, I think your page lacks some important sections, like reactions, history, and production. The "Stability" section seems a little bit confusing to me, and I think this section could be included into the physical property or safety. Also you could include more details in the sections you have, like the chemical reactions involved in synthesizing other chemicals. For the reference section, I think you need to change it into proper citation format. I suggest you to include more pictures along with the explanations. Keep up the good work!

Li180 (talk) 20:50, 2 November 2012 (UTC)