User talk:Anna.ghai

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include:  lush green Kullu Valley... It has made an impact in the markets in a short amount of time... allows users to make their favorite Indian dishes... made with the finest, freshest ingredients free from any preservatives, artificial color and flavor... It is a renowned organization... hygienically processed by an experienced team of professionals... quality & approved range... supervision of talented quality experts —and on and on in the same vein. It's not an encyclopaedia article, it's a sales leaflet
 * it's all about how marvellous the company is, just spam, plus a a spammy mission statement and a spammy list of products. Nothing about the company. Where is it based? How many employees? Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors?
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest. Note that I have already indefinitely blocked one account associated with your company for spamming

I am not prepared to restore unreferenced spam. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)