User talk:Anna90D

Speedy deletion nomination of IGO4 Limited
Hello Anna90D,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged IGO4 Limited for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. BiH (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Reply
Hi Anna, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. I deleted your article because
 * it was not clear that it meets the notability guidelines. You told us what it sells, but little about the company itself other its location. How many employees? Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors?
 * Concentrating on products gives it a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic in tone as well as content.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

Not a reason for deletion, but your refs will look better if you format as instead of bare urls

I'll shortly post the deleted text here for you to work on before it's thrown to the wolves again.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  17:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)