User talk:AnnaPlacebo

Welcome!

Hello, AnnaPlacebo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Vaccine injury have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or you can type   on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Daffydavid (talk) 15:53, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Daffydavid. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Vaccine injury because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Removal of accurate information with a WP:RS link will get you reverted every time. Daffydavid (talk) 18:14, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism
The information you added at Vaccine injury was not WP:RS because the link you provided was a link to a comment not an actual study. But even if you had linked the actual study, it would have amounted to cherry-picking since the body of evidence as a whole does not support casuation as you have indicated. Thus, the information would have violated WP:UNDO. --Daffydavid (talk) 18:19, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vaccine injury, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''If you think the information you have added is valid, discuss it at the article talk page. Continuing down the path you are on will only lead to an editing block for your account.'' Daffydavid (talk) 03:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Clearly you have no intention of discussing your edits but seem to think that you can win through brute force. --Daffydavid (talk) 05:03, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Edit war
Your recent editing history at Vaccine injury shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Calmer  Waters  05:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

I have discussed these back and forth changes on this page with both David and now with you. I have reverted back to the prior version before this edit war happened. Please discuss theses changes you want to do at either Talk:Vaccine injury or WT:MED. Also see WP:BRD. This has already become disruptive and block will be handed out for further continuation. Kindly Calmer   Waters  05:33, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring, as you did at Vaccine injury. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)