User talk:Anna Pask

March 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Úrsula Corberó, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 16:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chino Darín, you may be blocked from editing. Victor Trevor ( talk ) 14:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chino Darín, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Úrsula Corberó. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 12:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Úrsula Corberó. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 11:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are  not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. Your only purpose here is to try to impose on articles statements which are no more than your personal speculations. It is just barely possible that you originally came to edit Wikipedia with such total misunderstanding about the nature of Wikipedia that you really thought it would be acceptable to post your own speculations into articles, with no more justification than your own fantasies, as expressed in such terms as "look how cute they´re together and i think that they are together.. their eye contacts...", but if so you long ago learnt better, yet you have continued to do the same, switching to different accounts to do so, editing without logging in to do so, edit-warring to do so, and posting ridiculous talk page messages to justify doing so. If any more proof were needed that you have no intention of contributing constructively, it would have been provided by your vandalism on an editor's talk page. There are many web sites where this kind of playing around is acceptable, and you may like to go to one of those, but Wikipedia isn't one. You have also done similar disruptive editing on other Wikipedias, other than the English language one. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock, as described above. JBW (talk) 16:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)