User talk:Annaauc

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Bertalan Karlovszky
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bertalan Karlovszky, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.flickr.com/photos/32357038@N08/6649071873/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 11:01, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bertalan Karlovszky


A tag has been placed on Bertalan Karlovszky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Torreslfchero (talk) 11:10, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Gulácsy Lajos
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gulácsy Lajos, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.flickr.com/photos/32357038@N08/6501613937/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 11:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Article names
Please note that, on the English Wikipedia, the naming convention for articles is "(personal name) (family name)". I have corrected the names of the articles you have already created; keep this in mind for any future articles. Thank you. DS (talk) 14:52, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Valéria Dénes


A tag has been placed on Valéria Dénes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mdann52 (talk) 13:45, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Alajos Györgyi Giergl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Pest


 * Lajos Deák Ébner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Pest

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Álmos Jaschik
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Álmos Jaschik, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://bialczynski.wordpress.com/2011/06/08/hun-awarow-czyli-hungarow-ugorow-uhorzan-baja-slowianska-wedlug-almosza-jaszczyka-1885-1950/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bálint Kiss


A tag has been placed on Bálint Kiss requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mdann52 (talk) 13:52, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Béla Kontuly


A tag has been placed on Béla Kontuly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FrankDev (talk) 14:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of János Kmetty
Hello Annaauc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged János Kmetty for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, FrankDev (talk) 14:28, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

László Lakner
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of László Lakner, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://artportal.hu/international/angol/lakner_laszlo.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 15:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sándor Bihari


A tag has been placed on Sándor Bihari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 08:20, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tibor Boromisza


A tag has been placed on Tibor Boromisza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 08:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Szilárd Bauer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kassa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of György Ruttkay


The article György Ruttkay has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable artist, no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Satellizer  talk   contribs  11:00, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Annaauc -- persistent copyvios and spam. Thank you. MER-C 11:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Information on copyright, sources and external links
Hi. :) Seeing the situation above at ANI, I wanted to stop by and speak to you about some of our practices on Wikipedia.

First, the area where you're working can really use assistance - I'm glad to see Hungarian artists getting more attention, and hope you will continue to build on this content. I'm afraid, however, that material must be drawn from reliable sources (see WP:IRS) and auction websites (along with other commercial sites) do not qualify. For that reason, even if they are compatibly licensed, we cannot copy content from the auction website. We also cannot link them or other sites that they support in accordance with our approach to external sites. Additionally, we can't use sites like Flickr for biographical information or other open-source projects. We're safest with books, magazines, newspapers and reliable industry websites.

Second, I see that you have copied sentences and phrases from websites that are not compatibly licensed, as recently as today. I'm afraid that we just can't do that, except in brief and clearly marked quotations. Copy-paste has some information about our copyright policies, but in a nutshell - unless you can prove that content is public domain or compatibly licensed - you must summarize it in your own words and organization. As indicated above, even if it is public domain or compatibly licensed, we can't use it unless it's reliable.

If you have any questions about whether or not a source is reliable, you might want to check at WP:RSN. You can also visit the Teahouse. If you have any questions about what I've written here, please let me know, and I'll be happy to try to explain further. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your note. I'm afraid it looks like Budapestauction.com is pretty clearly a commercial site. At the bottom of their pages, it says, "We pay cash for the Hungarian painters listed below", and the "items on sale" tab includes such tell-tale language as "Selling paintings, sculptures with guarantees." On the sale pages, it says, "We take moral and financial responsibility for the authenticity of the items." According to a domain search (see) their keywords include things like "selling," while among their tags are "sell" and "advertise". I realize that it must be very hard to find sources about some of these painters, but I note that you have succeeded with a some of them. We might be limited to those artists whose are also listed in other sources, which is probably require anyway since one of the markers of notability is widespread coverage in reliable sources. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:22, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dezső Váli


The article Dezső Váli has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 02:31, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Andor Basch
Hi, I'm GeorgeLouis. Annaauc, thanks for creating Andor Basch!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. We need a biography for Andor Basch.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Gyula Batthyány, Annaauc!

Wikipedia editor GeorgeLouis just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Needs more biography, less list."

To reply, leave a comment on GeorgeLouis's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ways to improve Gyula Batthyány
Hi, I'm GeorgeLouis. Annaauc, thanks for creating Gyula Batthyány!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Need more biography and less list.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ways to improve Dezső Czigány
Hi, I'm Mabalu. Annaauc, thanks for creating Dezső Czigány!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider expanding this. The categories indicate for example that he committed suicide but that isn't explained in the article and should be.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Intellectual property clarification
Hi. I've removed the deletion tags you've placed on Gyula Czimra, Béla Spányi and other articles on the basis that "because source site has been removed but its intellectual property is used in the article." Perhaps you did not notice that the content in these articles has been changed? The material has been rewritten, all content from the commercial site removed that can be copyrighted. While the list of works may remain, a comprehensive list of works is not intellectual property under the US copyright law that governs us. (See Copyright in lists for more on why.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Just as an example, the article Valéria Dénes at the time you tagged it consisted entirely of the following: "Valéria Dénes (Budapest, 1877 - Pécs, 1915) was a Hungarian painter." No source can claim that her name, birth and death information, nationality and profession are their "intellectual property". The woman herself could not claim it. :) Rather than deleting such content, it's much better to build upon it. I've added a bit of information taken from another online source - but, of course, put it in my own words. This eliminates concerns about intellectual property, since the Biographical Encyclopedia of Hungary does not own the fact that she married a man or was a key figure in cubism any more than the auction site owns the basic biographical details and the list of works created by the artists they feature. It would be great if you could help expand these articles. I'm sure there's more information on them. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lili Ország
Hello Annaauc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lili Ország for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Károly Telepy
Hello Annaauc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Károly Telepy for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lajos Bruck
Hello Annaauc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lajos Bruck for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 14:19, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!
It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


 * --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dezső Váli
Hello Annaauc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dezső Váli for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Margit Sebők for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margit Sebők is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Margit Sebők until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahecht (talk • contribs) 18:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)