User talk:Annabelkate22

WebsEdge

 * Hi, thanks for your note, I would suggest that your best bet is to read Notability first. If you are still unsure then do come back to me. Regards Paste  Let’s have a chat. 14:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've seen your latest comment and the main thing that you need to do is to take note of the notability tag at the top of the article, specifically the point that says :- Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic. The article currently has no references, well there is one but it appears to be broken, and the external links make no mention of the subject of the article. You need to back up all major points in the article with well sourced, reliable references. I hope that helps. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 15:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I see that you have looked at the refs. I have sorted them so that the description is at the end of the ref so that it is clickable in the ref section of the article. However, the article is still unreferenced in the sense that there are no independent, third party refs that relate to the subject of the article and this is what is required. Regards. Paste  Let’s have a chat.
 * The Reuters one helps, but it looks very much like they have picked up a press release which could hardly be termed independent? I may be wrong but that is what it looks like. Do you know where you can get some truly independent refs on the company?-- Paste Let’s have a chat. 16:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, I hope you will now move on to edit and create other articles and generally help out at Wikipedia. Happy editing and come back to me at any time if you have any questions, I may not know the answer but we'll get there in the end!-- Paste Let’s have a chat. 16:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Read WP:BEBOLD and go for it!-- Paste Let’s have a chat. 16:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:WebsEdge Logo.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:WebsEdge Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)