User talk:Annadodane/sandbox

Hi I'm Anna and this is my sandbox Annadodane (talk) 20:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

I am going to make notes on an article I am reading; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit -Everything is relevant to the topic -The article is neutral -All of the links work to the websites that were cited - all of the articles were relevant and within a good time frame so they were not outdated -This article focused on the same topic and was thorough, I think it was well written and looking at the talk page made me realize how much really goes into an article like this -the only thing I would say wasn't good was that they used a lot of medical terms that many people may not know and did not offer external links to look up what they meant, they should do that to optimize the understanding of the readers Annadodane (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Ideas for a an update on wikipedia: smoking cessation hip arthroplasty left ventricular assistive devices brilenta: a new medicastion for STEMI's; is replacing clopidogrel compression therapy Annadodane (talk) 19:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Emergency Medical Services: -what EMS can do that nurses can't do without an order -what is in an EMS jurisdiction -what they have to be certified in and why -more information on how EMS has evolved Al-Shaqsi, S. (2010). Models of International Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Systems. Oman Medical Journal, 25(4), 320–323. http://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2010.92 Annadodane (talk) 21:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

EMS can perform medical techniques that typical health care workers can not perform. This is because of their jurisdiction and the quality of care they are allowed to is considerably more. An important legal issue of being a part of EMS is the immunity statue. An immunity statute mainly means that the basic components of negligence for EMS providers is higher and more reasonable compared to the typical standards. In other words, it lets EMS providers have more room to breath and to prove their negligence in the line of duty would be harder compared to proving negligence to normal standards. This is almost used as an incentive to be an EMS provider because most people are scared in terms of consequences if the do something wrong on the job, but this statue helps protect providers. Although this is not a covered policy in each state, it is in some. An example of this policy would be, "An EMS provider is sued for malpractice over some action taken in the course of providing medical care. Once a lawsuit has been filed, the employee’s defense counsel will review the complaint to determine whether they wish to file a motion to dismiss" EMSWORLD. (2005). Immunity Statutes: How State Laws Protect EMS Providers. Retrieved from https://www.emsworld.com/article/10323938/immunity-statutes-how-state-laws-protect-ems-providers Annadodane (talk) 23:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

What I've done on wikipedia has changed the way that I look into research. I think more critically on what research is viable and if how I am getting it is the right way to do it, because wikipedia made me realize that information needs to be validated before it can be put out into the world. I think that critiquing articles on wikipedia has made me change the way I look at research articles and analyze everything that is being said. Also, this semester I got to add onto an article and put my own information into an article. I realized that I had to double check that the information I was adding to this article because I had to give readers the right information. My time on wikipedia has taught me a lot about research and what you can and can't put into articles. I will always remember what wikipedia has taught me. Annadodane (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC)