User talk:Annaroosevelt

 Hi Annaroosevelt, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.


 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Button sig2.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * If you'd like to tell us about yourself and meet other new users, be sure to introduce yourself at our new user log.

 Good luck, and have fun. --Ilyushka88 15:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:IMAGEM CAMPO 2001 LOWER AMAZON PROJECT 330.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:IMAGEM CAMPO 2001 LOWER AMAZON PROJECT 330.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 18:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Cargill
I just deleted the paragraph about photos you intend to add to Cargill, since I don't think this material would be appropriate in this article and I don't want you to waste your energies in an unproductive direction. What Wikipedia is not may give you some guidance, especially Wikipedia is not a soapbox, Wikipedia is not ..a repository of ... images..., and Wikipedia is not a battleground. Your writing will also be more encyclopedic if you avoid Weasel words like 'apparently', and it must be verifiable, so please supply some references for the material you wrote.

If you want to highlight the damage being caused, the best way would be to write new articles (if none already exist) about the archaeological site and its history. You could then wikilink from the Cargil article to there.

Good luck, happy editing, and leave a reply here if you need assistance. (I'm no fan of multinational corporations either). --Derek Andrews 13:25, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Write a contribution
Hello. I noticed that the page you recently created, Write a contribution, covered the same subject as another article, Cornelius V.S. Roosevelt, and as such, I merged the former into the latter, leaving a redirect in its place.--Unscented (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Cargill Santarem.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:54, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sweet potato, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''Your 1965 source clearly doesn't discuss the later work, thus using it is original research on your part. An understandable error.'' Doug Weller  talk 13:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)