User talk:Anne-lise-marie

Welcome!

Hello, Anne-lise-marie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- Jytdog (talk) 15:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Conflicts of interest in Wikipedia
Hi Anne-lise-marieI work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia as well as heath content. Your edits to date are mostly adding the reference into articles.   I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Hello, Anne-lise-marie. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

Comments and requests
Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by out WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with the publishers or authors of that book? You can answer how ever you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, with please disclose it. After you respond (and you can just reply below), perhaps we can talk a bit about editing Wikipedia, to give you some more orientation to how this place works. You can reply here - I am watching this page. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 15:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You went ahead and added the book back to the Alzheimers article in this dif, after I wrote you the message above. Please respond. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 22:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Alzheimer's disease
I see that nearly all your contributions to Wikipedia involve adding links to one particular book to many different articles. It has been repeatedly removed by many different editors. Wikipedia editing relies on consensus and therefore you should not continually add it back in unless you discuss your addition on the article's talk page and get consensus to do so. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:28, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Due to your continued efforts to spam this book reference into Wikipedia I am requesting that actia-asso.eu be added to the spam blacklist. Jytdog (talk) 13:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

I am sorry, I don't know how Wikipedia works. I have tried to answer you one hour ago but I must have made a mistake and I don't know where I sent the message.

I just wanted to talk about this book that presents important informations for the scientists. If I have made it in a wrong way I am sorry. Tell me what to do about this book reference. Thank you
 * Spam bblack listing usually gets people to finally take things seriously and respond. Your behavior to date is terrible.  Please tell me what is your relationship with the publisher of this book?  Please reply here. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 14:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

I am working at Actia, the editor of the book. This book is free (can be free downloaded on Actia website) : there is no financial interest on it. Only scientist interest. Actia is a french network of 1200 french researchers working in food research. Actia depends on french Ministry for food. (http://www.actia-asso.eu/cms/rubrique-2097-association_de_savoir_faire.html)

This book is describing for the first time mechanisms in he brain and explain the origins of Alzheimer disease. It's a very important publication. If Wikipedia decide it mustn't be published in Wikipedia, I won't try any more.

Thank you.
 * Thanks for disclosing that. You are what we call a paid editor. Undisclosed paid editing violates the Terms of Use of Wikipedia.  Please read WP:PAID and again please read WP:COI.  Jytdog (talk) 14:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

OK As we have no financial interest in this publication I thought I could inform about this book. I understand better how it's working now. Thank you. Who could add this reference about ALZH ?
 * anyone who has no COI can do so. No one will, because it is not a good source in Wikipedia per our guideline for sources about health, WP:MEDRS. Jytdog (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jytdog, I have three questions : - Did you ask for Actia to be blacklisted on Wikipedia ? - As the book is based on 600 scientific publications couldn't it be considered as a secondary source ? - is it possible to publish scientific results of research on Wikipedia, when those results are radically new and explaining mechanisms that no one described before ? Thank you and have a nice day.

It would be nice to answer my questions. Thank you.Anne-lise-marie (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)