User talk:AnneBarbierPH

Welcome
Hello AnneBarbierPH. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AnneBarbierPH. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -- VViking Talk Edits 16:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


 * hi, i don't know how to use this system but why are you removing our additions ? we're not paid or such, ...
 * that's about open-source additions to the bespoke wiki page. please check your self : osr-plastic.org | it hosts a thousands of new files and additions to the bespoke project.
 * thank you ! AnneBarbierPH (talk) 16:46, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Paid/COI
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:AnneBarbierPH, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. -- VViking Talk Edits 16:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

removal
hi, i don't know how to use this system but why are you removing our additions ? we're not paid or such, ...

that's about open-source additions to the bespoke wiki page :

In 2018 Plastic-Hub started enhancing the project by adding numerous new machines and but also updates for the Precious Plastic machines. The additions are part of a new project 'OSR-Plastic (Open Source Recycling - Plastic)' which aims to serve Precious Plastic users but also clients from the industry.

March 2022
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


 * this is about related projects, OSR-Plastic builds on PreciousPlastic designs, we added around 30 new machines, open-source as well to the project.
 * so, how OSR-Plastic.org not a related project, considering we're working for hundreds of users in that project ?
 * thank you AnneBarbierPH (talk) 16:55, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter - you have an obvious conflict of interest. And you should not be promoting your project on Wikipedia. Not everything that is 'related' belongs on a Wikipedia article. - MrOllie (talk) 16:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I ask again, how is OSR-Plastic.org not a related project ?
 * the section says it clearly : related projects. Did you even bother to look it up ? AnneBarbierPH (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * That's irrelevant. Local plumbers are related to Plumbing, but we don't list them on our plumbing article. - MrOllie (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * so but how are all the other projects related then ? AnneBarbierPH (talk) 17:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * this is about PreciousPlastic, we're working voluntary since 4 years on it, so please tell - how is that not related ? we fixed of the designs according to user feedback. AnneBarbierPH (talk) 17:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is based on independent reliable sources, such as newspapers, peer reviewed journals, and so on. The other things written about are based on such sources. Your addition is not. - MrOllie (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * how's that ? you want me to send you our user directory ?
 * how do all the other listed projects have news paper articles ? AnneBarbierPH (talk) 17:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * No, your user directory is not an independent source. MrOllie (talk) 17:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * so, we create a new page then ? AnneBarbierPH (talk) 17:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * No, Sources must be independent - written by someone like a newspaper employee who has no connection to your project. No page you could create yourself would suffice. MrOllie (talk) 17:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * where is the conflict of interest ? you're making things up here, we are not ! AnneBarbierPH (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You are adding mentions of a project you are obviously involved in, that is a conflict. Please read WP:COI. You must stop trying to use Wikipedia to promote things you are involved with. - MrOllie (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * how are all the other projects have their place here ? it's the same thing AnneBarbierPH (talk) 17:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * No. Properly sourced content is not the 'same thing' as an unsourced self-promotional addition. MrOllie (talk) 17:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * well,
 * 1st, f*** your credible sources bs -
 * 2nd, preciousplastic is full bugs, at high expenses for the users
 * 3th, we f** fixed, also again at high expense
 * 4th, if you wanna censor this, please go f** your self - you ain't better than your 'credible' mafia bs sources ! AnneBarbierPH (talk) 20:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * yup, just checked, you are promoting here disqualified sources, with knowingly harmful content. where do we file complaints ? AnneBarbierPH (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Precious Plastic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring at Precious Plastic
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 23:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)