User talk:Annegreif20

hi
, ,

Hello, I created this account just to ask an question. I am in charged in development of a my school history project from my school on this topic:

"Holocaust: Events, Consequences, Legacy & Denial"

- Which is basically to do a Summary about the Holocaust, the Consequences and how it is dealt with its denial and speech of far-right hatred.

I'm almost done with the work, I use my school's bibliography, but I like wikipedia because it has something more and how it is dealt with and debated, and I see and use the editing history to investigate the issue of about the legacy in society.

I finished with the part of Holocaust denial against Czechoslovakians and decided to end the Holocaust against Serbs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial_of_genocide_of_Serbs_in_the_Independent_State_of_Croatia

And I was shocked.

I saw war of editions, I was frightened by the gigantic removal (almost 1/3 of the article) of content with a reliable source. I went to see the discussion and was disappointed, it was a impressive holocaust denial made by a holocaust denier against Jews, LGBT and at least: serbs.

I went in the history edit and looked for the version that did not have the sourced content removal, and I stayed on that.

I know that in wikipedia has to be careful about what it reads and takes it seriously (and that it is not such a reliable source), but I didn't expect that

It was the only article on holocaust denial that I saw that awful thing.

So, I wonder, am I wrong? Or that is an grothesque attempt of holocaust denial?

Many Hugs <3