User talk:Annette Tucker

Annette Tucker
Hi! I assume you are the Annette Tucker.... I've added a tag to the Annette Tucker article talk page pointing out that you've edited the article. That's not a problem in itself, and indeed we welcome contributions that improve factual accuracy especially on biographical articles, but, if you're not aware of them already, we do have guidance on conflict of interest and autobiography of which you might like to take note. Happy editing! Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi again. It would greatly help if you could direct some independent editors (like, uh, me maybe) towards some independent online sources that reference your work and activities, so that I can improve your article based on reliable sources.  It's not really a great idea to edit your own biography article, as I mentioned before.  I'm happy to help improve your article if I can, and you can find my email on my user page if you need it.  Regards, Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yet again.... you need to read the policy on conflict of interest, and please try to restrain yourself from contributing to that article. If there are errors - genuine errors - in the article, you need to raise them on the article talk page and not try to remedy them yourself.  I have corrected the error about your name at birth, for which I apologise.  But, there is public information that Annette May Tucker, of Los Angeles, was born in 1933.  Per WP:BLP,  I will not give the date.  If there are sources saying that she/you were born in 1943, I haven't yet seen them.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:46, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:AnnetteTucker.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AnnetteTucker.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Nadia Sahari.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nadia Sahari.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Nadia Sahari.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nadia Sahari.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)