User talk:Annh07/Archives/2024/May

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

hello my friend
New record with 5.4M Likes and 215M views this is fantastic. Please check and fix the record thanks 2A01:5EC0:1FE1:1432:1:0:49A3:BB98 (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, please read the description: The following table lists the last ten posts that were once the most-liked post on Instagram, with the number of likes as they were when the top spot was reached. The post you want to add is not a record, because to break the record, this post must surpass the current record of 75.4 million likes. Annh07 (talk) 10:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Bro why removing Pakistan?????
Why dude why JypsyDanger123 (talk) 12:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I have indefinitely blocked JypsyDanger123. JBW (talk) 12:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks JBW. It seems they are not here to build Wikipedia. Annh07 (talk) 12:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

My edit on "Hans (name)"
Why did you remove my edit on the page for "Hans (name)"?

Lauscherhans is a real thing that does exist. RetroGamingNow will prove that. Llyon239 (talk) 06:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Llyon239, there are no articles related to Hans Altmann or Lauscherhans. Also the source you provided is a blog, not a reliable source. Please read WP:UGC. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 06:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello and hope you're doing well
Hello Annh07. I hope this message meets you well. If you are not too busy, help review the page Dave 'Heavy D' Sparks. Cheers and thanks in advance. Wallclockticking (talk) 19:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Wallclockticking. This may take some time, please be patient. Annh07 (talk) 10:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You reviewed what I have worked on previously and you were so encouraging to me and your kind of nurturing approach helped me alot in my improvement as an editor. Take a look, Dave 'Heavy D' Sparks, Cheers. Wallclockticking (talk) 20:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Andri Eleftheriou
The update on Andri Eleftheriou 's Wikipedia is more than reliable considering that all the update done by Shooter848484 is on display publicly. Please have a check on Google and ISSF page to confirm the details 's authenticity before removing the contents. Always nice though to see everyone is alert ☺️ Didilina09 (talk) 13:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @Didilina09. When you add new content you need to cite reliable sources (by inline citation). Please read WP:PROVEIT. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 13:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Don't revert my edits
The fula are the 11% BakarDaEmir (talk) 14:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @BakarDaEmir. When you add or change the content of the article, you need to cite reliable sources. Please read WP:PROVEIT. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 14:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the reply, I'm sorry for the lack of citation, I got it from the Fula people page. BakarDaEmir (talk) 14:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You need to cite the source in the article. If you don't know how to do that, see WP:INCITE. Annh07 (talk) 15:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

edits
Why is my page not taken? M NASIR IRFAN KHAN (talk) 15:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @M NASIR IRFAN KHAN,
 * Your draft has no indication of significance, no context, no improvement after previous rejection. Also it looks like you are writing about yourself, please review the autobiography policy. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 16:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I want to create a page of my name that contains everything about me M NASIR IRFAN KHAN (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @M NASIR IRFAN KHAN,
 * We always want new editors here on Wikipedia, but the encyclopaedia is not a place to promote yourself or your project. If you there is enough independent coverage about what you're doing, it might indeed be appropriate for there to be an article about you, but it would need to be written neutrally rather than promotionally, not include external links to your work, and be written by someone with no connection to you. That last point is crucial; no one should be making an article about themselves. Please read WP:COI. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 17:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks so much for the barnstar :). -- Annh07 (talk) 18:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * You're welcome! :) -- Annh07 (talk) 08:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Re:Not providing reliable sources
Hello @Annh07 I saw that you reverted my edits in the José Raúl Mulino article,


 * first of all, i'm from Panama, I saw the elections and so I have knowledge about topic.
 * Second of all, I translated that from the Spanish Wikipedia.
 * third of all, the Spanish Wikipedia was just providing footnotes (I don't know a lot of footnotes because I don't use them) so I didn't place them in the article.

Last of all, i'm not trying to start a edit war, or a discussion, just wanted you to know this points, have a good day.

 Emojione 1F6AA.svg  15:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @W!kipedista. Yes, I reverted your edits in the José Raúl Mulino article because it was completely unsourced.
 * Some bold edits are required by Wikipedia policies for example unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion (see WP:BLPSOURCE). With some bold edits the reversal of the edit can only be made if the version reverted to includes a citation from a reliable source (see WP:PROVEIT).
 * Usually, if someone reverts your bold changes, then discuss the proposed changes on the article's talk page and reach a consensus for the changes before reverting a revert (see How consensus emerges during the editing process). Happy editing! Annh07 (talk) 15:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok, understood, thanks for responding, happy editing! W!kipedista's sigature 2.pngW!kipedista's sigature (an red).png Emojione 1F6AA.svg  13:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Sky-Watch
Hi Annh07,

I tried to update the Sky-Watch page to reflect current management team and products. It seems you reverted it. I am not sure why, the information currently published is not correct. Please let me know what I can do to make sure the information provide reflects what the correct company information Tje-sky-watch (talk) 18:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Your were informed on your user talk page why your edits were unacceptable. I suggest you read the comments there. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @Tje-sky-watch. Get this straight, because you have a conflict of interest with Sky-Watch, you should not directly edit articles about this organization (see WP:COI), all edits must be through the article's talk page, please use this template: Edit COI. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 18:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Tje-sky-watch. In addition, you should not add promotional materials to the article nor remove existing references. Please read WP:ADS. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

User Guhyjlkm
I'm not sure what the next steps are to take with regards to this editor. Do you have any ideas? Regards, Kiwipete (talk) 18:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Kiwipete. I have sent them a final warning. If they continue, report them at AIV. Annh07 (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

End of world war 2
The Italians ,the defeat,resisters.The liberation of the concentration camps Mosa2121 (talk) 11:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Mosa2121. What do you want to discuss? If you want to add content to the article again, please provide a reliable source. In addition, you should not copy text from elsewhere (most sources are copyrighted materials). Please review the policies and guidelines on your talk page. If you need help, please post a question at Tea house. Annh07 (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

User:152.58.72.246
Thanks for your report. You mentioned block evasion. What other addresses or accounts are involved? Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Jake Wartenberg. You can see Gulab Chand Kataria's page history, many IPs have been blocked for similar behavior. I also requested temporary page protection. Annh07 (talk) 17:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I've semi-protected the page. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you. They made too many worthless edits, causing the history of the article to become unnecessarily bloated. Annh07 (talk) 18:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

John Singer Sargent
Why did you revert my edit regarding the movie? "Link spam" does not explain it. The link was not an advertisement. Maurice Magnus (talk) 11:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Maurice Magnus. That link was posted by an editor with a conflict of interest: ExhibitionOnScreen – they based their username on Exhibition On Screen (see the about page on their website). They spammed their site in many articles. You should also visit their talk page to see the discussions. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 12:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * But I reposted it independently of that person. I have no conflict of interest. Maurice Magnus (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Of course you can restore the content because you have no conflict of interest. However, if you can find a better and more independent source, you should replace it. Annh07 (talk) 12:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I restored it and added a link to an independent source, namely a review in The Guardian. But I see no reason to delete the official source. Of course, it promotes the film, but it also contains information about it. Maurice Magnus (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

thetruthlies website
Hello, I had recently added a website as a reference to the Black ops 6 Wikipedia page under marketing and you seemed to revert the page giving the reason "not needed". I apologize if I find it unclear as to the reason why you reverted as I am new to Wikipedia editing. But I think the website could be needed if people would like to preview the marketing material used. I do understand that the website could possibly be a temporary website. TheOminousBlade (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @TheOminousBlade. Your edit is not adding a reference, you are actually just providing an external link to a website as a reference. The purpose of references is to help readers verify the content in the article – what is stated in the article must be cited from reliable published sources (see Verifiability). When adding references, you must provide a specific link to the page containing the source material, not just a link to its home page, which is not helpful to the reader because they need to verify information, not learning about that website. I encourage you to read Help:Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Happy editing! Annh07 (talk) 21:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)