User talk:AnniceC

Hey Girl, Hey...
Is this stupid? Yes! Are we going to keep doing it? Also Yes!! xx — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoldVine5 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello from me!
Thank you for coming along today. Don't forget to do the Sandbox tutorial in the Dashboard, and I'll see you next week! Cbderbylib (talk) 12:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Feedback for Marjorie Cottle article:
Feedback for Marjorie Cottle article:

The article was generally well written, though some prosaic language was used and could be altered using a more neutral tone. The lead section was brief, clear, and nicely summarised her achievements without bias. The structure of the article was well organised, but general consensus suggested that the 'Marriage' section could be included within another section, to eliminate single-sentence sections. Most sections were of equal weight excluding those that contained statistics and other extra information which helped with the flow of the article. Wikilinks were used well, more could be added but are not necessary. The article did contain some opinionated/ persuasive language (eg. 'Even [she gave up]' in the Later Life section). To correct this, a more neutral tone should be adopted whilst editing. There appeared to be little to no criticism to counteract the positives - did she get any professional critiques (sexist or otherwise)? A good variety of references were used, and no noticeable copyright violations - is there a copyright-free image available? Again, subjective/ value statements were used, mostly in relation to citations/ quotes, but some could be removed. GoldVine5 (talk) 11:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)