User talk:AnnieLess


 * }

Reverting
I noticed you reverted a revert to your edits on United States customary units with an edit summary was good. Differences of opinion about an article's content should be discussed on the article's talk page to identify a consensus. Please take care to assume good faith of other editors.

Have a look at the etiquette of bold, revert, discuss and do spend a few hours perusing our major policies and guidelines which I have added linking to above. Thanks for contributing! —EncMstr (talk) 17:46, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

de Morgan and the Metric System
The discussion about de Morgan in the article Metric System is your view against my view. The way to resolve the issue is NOT, repeat NOT by plastering banners across the page. The way is to resolve disputes is described in Dispute resolution. Please read that. You have also obviously not read Vandalism as requested in an earlier post of mine. This is a final warning, if you reinstate the banner without attempting to resolve the issue through a third party, I will be reporting you for vandalism. Martinvl (talk) 19:35, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Please cut the aggression and stop the threats. The solution is clear - add the reason why de Morgan's comments are significant, or remove his comments. If you are having difficulty finding a reason, then discuss the possibilities, but don't brush it under the carpet. I'll help you to phrase it if you like, but what is it exactly? AnnieLess (talk) 19:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

ANI notification
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Martinvl (talk) 04:54, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Why?

 * Who took part in this so-called "review", and where is it documented? Or is that just your personal conclusion after a quick glance at the evidence that 'the name "AnnieLess" looks like a play on the words "Any Less"? AnnieLess (talk) 06:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * See Sockpuppet investigations/DeFacto/Archive -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:47, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * There is no evidence there involving me, just an allegation based on unfounded speculation such as 'The name "AnnieLess" looks like a play on the words "Any Less"'! I take it that you must think there was sufficient there to warrant a block? And why was it taken without question? And who is toddst1, and why did he get involved? AnnieLess (talk) 06:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for giving this request your due consideration Daniel. I see from your edit history that you could have wasted as much as 6 minutes before deciding, on the balance of probabilities no doubt, that what looks like a bunch of ill-conceived crap to me, is in fact sound justification for an indefinite block. If there was any element of justice or fair play involved in this process, the opportunity to defend oneself would be before the jury retires to consider the evidence (there is a neutral and randomly selected panel making these judgements I assume) and not after the sentence has been carried out. What sort of "arguments" have I got to make to get this crazy and despicable charge dropped? Is the onus on me to explain the blindingly obvious for each and every allegation - the alternative, and infinitely more plausible to all but an idiot, explanation? AnnieLess (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * How about addressing the allegations? The ANI discussion was quite brief, but links your activities to  who was banned indefinitely.  The evidence for the connection between you and DeFacto is here.  Present your case here.  Further whining and attacks will result in loss of talk page editing.  —EncMstr (talk) 22:14, 17 May 2013 (UTC)