User talk:Anniegotterson

August 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Wageble has been reverted. Your edit here to Wageble was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHnVLjw9ScQ, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHnVLjw9ScQ, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHnVLjw9ScQ) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Regarding inline citations and categorization etc.
Hi. I see you have removed the tags at Wageble regarding the article's lack of inline citations and categories (please read both links), without actually fixing either of the issues, which isn't really productive. Merely removing tags does not fix issues. See what I did here for an idea of how categorization works. As for inline citations, please read the link above. Also, the article in its present state has some tone issues. Manxruler (talk) 09:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Re-using the same reference multiple times
Hello Anniegotterson, just a quick additional tip to improve Wagëblë, if you don't mind: you can re-use the same reference multiple times, without inserting all the information multiple times. The basic system for this is described at Help:Referencing for beginners. As you are mostly using Visual Editor, the function for this in VE can be found under "Cite" -> "Re-use". The full reference information needs only be added once at first usage, for later usages you can create short duplicates under a unique connecting "ref name" (VE will use simple numbers as "names"). If you are stuck or have additional questions, please feel free to ping me. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 17:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)