User talk:Anniemwright


 * }

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page English Heritage has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://twitter.com/EnglishHeritage/. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

English Heritage
I've reverted your edits yet again - you seem to be removing sourced material without a valid reason, and adding promotional websites as mentioned above. I notice that you have recently joined, and have only edited the English Heritage page. Are you an interested party in any way? Rob Sinden (talk) 11:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I hope you can help - I am indeed new to Wikipedia and have no idea how to reply to people who send me messages? Is this right? Am just guessing...


 * Yes I am an interested party but simply want to update the English Heritage page to be useful to people wanting to find out about the organisation, the current page is hopelessly out of date and full of strange and random references. I wanted to ask the Comms team in EH to write something that people may find useful and replace the text here with that. But first I tried editing a few bits to see if I could work out how it works. I understand that wikipedia is for everyone to edit. Am I not allowed to edit it if I work for the organisation in question? Even if I am trying to make the information more accurate and up to date? The images of savile row are odd as we are no longer based there, and the logo should not really be used like that without our name prited underneath. I think the text has errors too, which various colleages keep asking me if I can correct. If you can help advise I would be most grateful! Anniemwright (talk) 16:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Annie - welcome to Wikipedia! The thing is, is that wikipedia is not a marketing tool, but a neutral collection of information from other sources.  I'd recommend you had a look at WP:Five Pillars.  Primary sources are acceptable sometimes, but tertiary sources are preferred.  Therefore, if you are adding information, you should make sure that it is verifiable from somewhere else (preferably from another website) and noted accordingly using the reference tags.  You should be careful about neutrality and not try to put a bias on any article.  With the English Heritage site in particular, removing information that may be seen to not necessarily throw a good light, shouldn't be done in order to show a positive spin.  I notice that you removed sourced information without giving a reason - this is why it was reverted.  It could be seen as useful information to some, so things like that should be discussed on the relevant talk page (or at another editor's talk page) if you find yourself disagreeing with another editor.  Oh - and be careful of the three revert rule.
 * Good luck with your editing - we're all just here to make it better, so you can always ask other editors for help. Hope I've been of some assistance, and please leave a message on my personal talk page if I can help further.  Rob Sinden (talk) 08:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)