User talk:Annunaki10x

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Rklawton 18:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please note to properly source your contributions with reliable, verifiable sources. Original research is not allowed. Rklawton 18:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Henry Pollack
Whom prescribed the medication? Doctors did. It was a 36 count indictment yet only counts 33-36 where pled guilty to. Why, the government was being nice? Hardly, the doctors stood behind their prescriptions or they would have faced malpractice.. The government wanted to avoid a trial. Further, by definition prescribed medication entails medical need. Due to the high cost of HGH, the government has redifined medical needs where human growth hormone is concerned. Further, they stated he caused "others" to submit claims or misrepresent" its a government play on words...think.. which "others" prescribe medication? Aliens from planet X or doctors? It does not sound reasonable a patient causing doctors to misrepresent a medical condition? Causing "others" is more vague, there is more here than you know, by paraphrasing the governments line, you are doing a diservice please leave as it was to be fair to BOTH sides. Thanks.Can you provide a reliable source for this statement which you have attempted to add to the article?
 * "Even though three different doctors over a ten year period felt this medication was medically necessary for Mr. Pollack and were prepared to testify to that effect a week before his trial. The federal government, days before the trial, decided to drop 32 counts in order to secure a plea from Mr. Pollack. Many stated that this investigation began exactly after Mr. Pollack confronted Cuban diplomats in Geneva, though that may well be just a coincidence."

I have read through both sources given, and there is nothing present in either about this. And by the way, I suggest you talk about the changes you wish to make to the article at Talk:Henry Pollack first before you do so. If you make the same edits again without first engaging in discussion, you face sanction for violation the three revert rule here at Wikipedia. Tabercil
 * This edit seams acceptable to me Henry it is verifiable and does not sugar coat anything and states the facts. Good work. Callelinea 18:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Second edit you did went to far as to trying to impose opinions and not facts. Sorry but had to revert it. Please leave it alone for now. If you keep editing it others might revert it to the way it was originally.Callelinea 18:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Unacceptable practices
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Tabercil 19:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)