User talk:Anon3684

December 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Neera Tanden. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 04:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Sirota, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not the place for political advocacy. Sjö (talk) 05:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neera Tanden, you may be blocked from editing. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks like a pretty major WP:BLP violation. – Novem Linguae (talk) 07:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kyle Kulinski. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. – Novem Linguae (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I think his addition of an irrelevant paragraph about Julian Assange on a biography of someone else is just straight up vandalism, and judging by his previous warnings (and his username), this is very probably a vandalism-only account. We might want to contact a sysop to ask if they think a block is appropriate, especially if they continue.  Vanilla  Wizard  💙 07:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tim Pool, you may be blocked from editing.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia for political campaigns. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Niko House
Hello, Anon3684. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Niko House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Niko House


Hello, Anon3684. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Niko House".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! --Ferien (talk) 07:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)