User talk:Anon9088

Unspecified source/license for File:Http---sizzlingsuperstars.com-wp-content-uploads-2016-09-Ashley-Benson-9.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Http---sizzlingsuperstars.com-wp-content-uploads-2016-09-Ashley-Benson-9.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 06:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Http---sizzlingsuperstars.com-wp-content-uploads-2016-09-Ashley-Benson-9.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Http---sizzlingsuperstars.com-wp-content-uploads-2016-09-Ashley-Benson-9.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 14:18, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:FFN GG TIFF Rush PR 090813 51202208.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FFN GG TIFF Rush PR 090813 51202208.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 05:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Http---a.abcnews.com-images-Entertainment-AP Horrible Bosses1 ml 141119 16x9 992.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Http---a.abcnews.com-images-Entertainment-AP Horrible Bosses1 ml 141119 16x9 992.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 06:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kay Cannon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Second City and Baby Mama. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FFN GG TIFF Rush PR 090813 51202208.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:FFN GG TIFF Rush PR 090813 51202208.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 11:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Http---a.abcnews.com-images-Entertainment-AP Horrible Bosses1 ml 141119 16x9 992.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Http---a.abcnews.com-images-Entertainment-AP Horrible Bosses1 ml 141119 16x9 992.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 11:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:FFN GG TIFF Rush PR 090813 51202208 (2).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FFN GG TIFF Rush PR 090813 51202208 (2).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 04:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jason Sudeikis We're The Millers.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Jason Sudeikis We're The Millers.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:31, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FFN GG TIFF Rush PR 090813 51202208 (2).jpg


A tag has been placed on File:FFN GG TIFF Rush PR 090813 51202208 (2).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Selena Gomez, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Selena Gomez. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thanks! – Rickt11 (talk) 16:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jason Sudeikis, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Selena-gomez.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Selena-gomez.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Anon9088, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 16:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Olivia Wilde. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Olivia Wilde. Sundayclose (talk) 03:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Armstrong Acting Studios Toronto.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Armstrong Acting Studios Toronto.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 06:45, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Armstrong Acting Studios
Hi,

In order for a standalone article to exist on Wikipedia, it should meet notability guidelines. Per Articles for deletion/Armstrong Acting Studios, Armstrong Acting Studios was determined to not meet the guidelines, and that a redirect was appropriate. Unless you have sources that show the notability guidelines have been met, please do not undo the redirect again. Thanks.--- Whpq (talk) 11:42, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

STOP uploading copyrighted images to Wikipedia
You are ASKING for a block. Wikipedia has very strict policies about copyright violations because of legal problems. You have uploaded numerous copyrighted images and received many warnings. If there is something about Wikipedia's policies on copyright that you don't understand this is your last chance to ask. The next time you violate policy you will be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 16:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Margot Robbie. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ron h jones (Talk) 01:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peyton Kennedy
Hello, Anon9088. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Peyton Kennedy, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:12, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Peyton Kennedy
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you.

I was hoping to get your attention when I removed the poor sources you added. Could you please respond, ideally after reviewing my edit summaries? Specifically, you don't appear to be paying attention to the information you're adding to articles (George Aziz?), not paying attention to the quality of sources you're trying to use, not providing reliable source for the information you're adding, and not paying attention to what is and is not appropriate content for encyclopedia articles. --Ronz (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Keanu Reeves. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Information about discretionary sanctions
TonyBallioni (talk) 21:08, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Soft pop (talk) 12:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Selena Gomez, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Puma and OPI ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Selena_Gomez check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Selena_Gomez?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Stop adding poorly sourced biographical content
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Ashley Olsen ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ashley_Olsen check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ashley_Olsen?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to I'm Still Here, Holiday in the Sun and Getting There
 * Mary-Kate Olsen ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mary-Kate_Olsen check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mary-Kate_Olsen?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to It Takes Two, Holiday in the Sun and Getting There

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Snuggums (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 16:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Agreed with <b style="color:#009900">Snuggums</b> Origamicraft2 (talk) 19:38, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Selena Gomez. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Kodachrome (2017 film) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kodachrome (2017 film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jason Sudeikis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Going the Distance ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jason_Sudeikis check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jason_Sudeikis?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leslie Cockburn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Mateo ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Leslie_Cockburn check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Leslie_Cockburn?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barron Trump (February 17)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Power~enwiki was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barron Trump and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barron Trump, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Barron_Trump Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Power~enwiki&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Barron_Trump reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 00:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natasha Richardson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Peter's Episcopal Church ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Natasha_Richardson check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Natasha_Richardson?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Natasha Richardson. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 10:13, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! <b style="color:#009900">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 21:51, 12 March 2018 (UTC)


 * You seriously need to start using edit summaries. Not including them in your edits is poor practice and can sometimes be suspicious. If you don't want people to think you're trying to hide something, then please use an edit summary for each contribution you make. <b style="color:#009900">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 04:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * It's quite obvious you've been purposefully ignoring notices. Bad move on your part. You especially should use edit summaries for any major changes you make within pages. <b style="color:#009900">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 14:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olivia Wilde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Olivia_Wilde check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Olivia_Wilde?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Megan Hess


Hello, Anon9088. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Megan Hess".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  18:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olivia Wilde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Olivia_Wilde check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Olivia_Wilde?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 00:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at January Jones. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 00:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Kutcher for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Kutcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael Kutcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Barron Trump
Regarding your recent edits and page move: This page has a history and associated talk page that belong in main space. If you wish to create a draft, by all means do so, but leave the original page where it is until and if the draft reaches a stage where it can be merged with the history of the current redirect. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris Zylka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CW. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)