User talk:AnonAnnu/archive

"Defunct" parties
Please could you provide references for the fact that the parties you are listing as defunct actually being defunct. Just because they didn't contest the 2015 elections, doesn't mean they aren't still in existence. Number  5  7  16:30, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: Email
I saw your email and went to act on it, but then I saw that Monty845 had handled it before I got there. Thanks for looking out for the situation. Nyttend (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think deletion would be a good idea. Please look at my most recent edit to that page: a bunch of pages had been history merged there, so deleting the page would get rid of a lot of useful stuff that shouldn't be deleted.  Moving it wouldn't be good, since there's currently an account with that name, and by moving it away we'd deprive him of his talk page.  Nyttend (talk) 06:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm Epeefleche. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. As here. Epeefleche (talk) 00:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of oldest radio stations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KDKA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CHRY-FM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soca. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Monarchy of the Commonwealth Realms


The article Monarchy of the Commonwealth Realms has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * While each Commonwealth realm is a monarchy, the term "Monarchy of the Commonwealth realms" only occurs in a few usergroups.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrKiernan (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Ben Levin
Your page move of Ben Levin was completely inappropriate. I'm tempted to block you for it alone, and any similar events in the future will lead to a block. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Reverting
I (obviously) reverted or amended your bold edits with reasonable edit summaries. Please do not react with knee-jerk, blind reverts (the lack of reason behind your reverts being illustrated in this edit, which restores the very "nonsense" you say in the summary the revert is supposed to fix). WP:BRD says that when your new change has been reverted, you should not revert and move to the talk page to seek consensus for the change you wish to make. -- Ħ   MIESIANIACAL  15:46, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Not my edit. AnonAnnu (talk) 16:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Just coincidentally a full restoration of the version you composed, eh? And by the same anon that did the same at Succession to the Throne Act, 2013, and that edited List of premiers of Alberta, like you did the week prior, too? Interesting... -- Ħ   MIESIANIACAL  20:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * (Sigh) There's no need for sockpuppetry since the revert limit isn't at hand and given that there's a new premier of Alberta it's not a particularly uncommon place to edit. Maybe instead of casting personal aspersions you can find a justification for removing the last three words of the quote other than the fact that you don't like what the lawyer said (which was your justification in a previous edit.) AnonAnnu (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think I was in any way unreasonable to think you and the anon were/are the same person. Perhaps the sockpuppet comment went too far, though. I apologise. Ħ   MIESIANIACAL  22:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)