User talk:AnonEMouse/Archive 2

Fair use image
Hey, just thought I should inform you that I have tagged an image you uploaded, Image:TWBGB2.jpg, as orphaned, and it may be deleted in about a week. I had to remove it from the only article it was in (gang bang) since it can only be used in an article about the video. Take care&#160;—  The KMan  talk  05:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and replied on the talk page. Thanks for clearing things up!&#160;—  The KMan  talk  15:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Image:Alessandra Mussolini Playboy IT Cover.jpg
I have responded to your concern about the fair use admissibility of said image at my. If the cover appearance is notable as more than just a cover appearance, and the article discusses this, I have no problem with it as a fair use image. Thanks. TheProject 22:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

NSFW
I think WDTM means What does that mean? NSFW means not safe for work (Meaning content that probably shouldn't be viewed on a public computer). I have no dispute with it being fair use or not, but it's probably best to have an image that doesn't show the three nude (I don't have a problem--and why would I? ;)--with the image, but you never know who would). Ohyeahmormons 20:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Smile!


Ohyeahmormons|(talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Your Opport
Cute! :) - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 13:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Which is not to say that your criticism is unfounded, of course. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 13:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I got a Suppose ... :-)  + +Lar: t/c 18:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Yasmine Bleeth's mug shot
I hope that if your mother dies due to a terribly painful death like inflammatory breast cancer like Yasmine Bleeth's mother, when Yasmine was only 20 years old, that someone will not throw it in your face for succumbing to a cocaine addiction temporarily.

Your excuse that it's the only public domain picture is pathetic. What if the only public domain picture was a nude picture of her? Would you post that to her site? Have you no shame? Bcsurvivor 19:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

CrazyRussian's RfA

 * Thanks... it's actually "ni puha ni pera", and it would be appropriate before the RfA, not after it's been successful, but thanks, anyway. We won't argue - we'll just exchange ideas lol- CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 13:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Suzen Johnson
Because I'm an idiot, that's why. I'll put 'em back. Thanks for the catch!--Mike Selinker 18:11, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

My dear AnonEMouse
My dear AnonEMouse, first of all, allow me to tell you you have one of the coolest usernames I have ever seen (you know, the kind that gives you the thought "why didn't "I" come up with it first?". Anyway, seriously, and with a big apology included for the very belated reply, I just couldn't go on letting one more day pass without thanking you wholeheartedly for the beautiful words you had of my userpage. I always think it's like an album of different pictures of me, depicting my mood over time. For example, I included the "Being Indian is..." part after an unplesant incident IRL. Come to think of it, aren't all our contribs small bits of a puzzle that depict us?

Oh well, enough phylosophy for today... just, thank you, dear Mouse ;) Having people like you visiting me is always a joy and a pleasure, so please, feel free to drop by anytime; and needless to say, should you ever need me, just make sure to whistle my way. A big big hug,  Phædriel   ♥   tell me   - 01:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC) PS. I'm glad you understood the poetic license there - it's never "that" blunt, but believe me, it's still real... XXX


 * It is a cool username, but I think Mr. Mouse should be warned that Anon E. Mouse was a psuedonym previously adopted on wikien-l by an abusive troll, who was probably banned user Enviroknot. The coincidence is unfortunate.  Dragons flight 14:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Saryn Hooks
You participated in the Finola Hackett AfD. Please also join the discussion here: Articles for deletion/Saryn Hooks (second nomination). Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:26, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Saryn Hooks
Yet another article rescued from deletion. How icteritious! - CrazyRussian talk/email 19:26, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, what about the thousands of MLB (and predecessor) players back to the 1880's? Today, one at bat, and someone writes a stub. But from the 1880's we have articles on a dozen of baseballers! Same difference. - CrazyRussian talk/email 19:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * BTW, spelling bee is a uniquely anglophone concept as far as I understand. In Russia there has never been such a thing, even just generally at school, to say nothing of televised. - CrazyRussian talk/email 19:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Minimum yearly contract at MLB is $200K p.a. Divide by 162 games is how much you'd make if you were released after one at-bat. - CrazyRussian talk/email 19:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Robert Kerman
Ah, no, I simply forgot to add it back after organizing the material. If you want, add it back but respect style. Ciao! --Attilios 13:48, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmmm... titles of movies should be in italics. Say Debbie Does Dallas instead of Debbie Does Dallas. Bye!--Attilios 16:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:Articles for deletion/Jack Hammer (porn actor)
Well I interpreted the nom's opinion slightly differently than you did. I can see the result both ways, and I did consider just putting it as keep, and could easily have done. However, does it really matter? Result was the same in the end- article was kept. Petros471 19:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

You should probably read...
...this: User_talk:Rbanzai. FYI. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Of course, perhaps Anon Y. Mouse was sent consistent with Sam's request that God grant us more editors like AnonEMouse... :) Joe 21:42, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * !!! Splutter, choke, cough. LOL. AnonEMouse (squeak) 22:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Adminship requirements
Thank you for your note; I'm happy to explain the circumstances. If you have a look further down Requests_for_adminship, it states '"Neutral" comments are also permitted, but are not ordinarily counted in determining percentages, although they are considered by bureaucrats in borderline cases.'

Based on support and oppose votes alone, Mtz206 had more than 77% support. In such a borderline case, I took considerable time in checking votes, and looked at the reasoning by all editors, including those who were neutral. Ultimately, this was a borderline case, and I concluded that the RfA did demonstrate a general consensus to promote the user, within the usually applied standards.

I hope this clears up the situation; if you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to ask me. Warofdreams talk 18:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

User:His excellency
This user has already been blocked for personal attacks so many times, both under the present username, as well as User:Amibidhrohi, that InShaneee's final warning was, if anything, lenient. Pecher Talk 18:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello AnonEMouse, I too was a bit puzzled as I mentioned on User:Inshaneee's talk page. Netscott 18:27, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the fixes. I've become spellcheck-dependent. :) His Excellency... 01:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David aaron clark
You're right... I was being a little more careful because of the new Speedy keep rule, but this does meet my criteria for a keep after reviewing it. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. --W.marsh 13:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Your comment on my RfA
You claimed that WP:BITE was just about newbies to Wikipedia, but it's not. In particular there is an entire section devoted to not biting new admins. --ScienceApologist 20:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your fair consideration of my position. It was greatly appreciated! I'd give you a barnstar, but I can't find the right one. --ScienceApologist 21:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

I consider your behavior at Brandy Alexandre to be borderline stalking
This is your last warning.--Jimbo Wales 02:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

I remember you
Before I was blocked forever as Dzoni,you were the only one to be against my first short block.I remember you.If you dont remeber just look at Alessandras talk page and my discussion with that little Lacatosias.

Anyway,I would prefer if you stop vandalizing Alessandras article,because their is no need to show her Playboy picture.There is too many words about it in the article,no need for picture.

As for Sinisa,he is a great friend of Alessandra,and he is now better then ever,so they are really dumb idiots.

Ice Cold 23:16, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

ALso,how woulda you likda your naked pictures published like that on Internet.She doe snot deserve it,not after all she did for Italia. Ice Cold 23:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes,that is right.Still,would you like your naked pictures when you was a child to be published now in article about you(if you were respected politician and patriota like Alessandra) Ice Cold 09:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes,but its a kind of pedofilia,since she were 17 or 18 at the time those picture were taken

Ice Cold 14:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Vicca
Just wanted to give you kudos on your work on the Vicca article. It's sad that it took an AfD to get the thing sourced, since the original editor was unwilling or unable to source it correctly. So I'd just like to say, thank you, boss. :-) -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 15:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Notable relatives
Hiya, thanks for the comment about the bio page, and your support in the AfD. I do agree, that it seems a bit much to list every notable person that I'm related to. I indeed have a lot of interesting people in my family tree, but not enough to justify something like a page on the Kennedy family. In terms of my great-great-granduncle though, the strongest reason to probably include him, is that I'm considered somewhat of an expert on him (check Google under "Saint Raphael Kalinowski", and you'll see that my site on him is the top link). I've also gotten a certain amount of blogosphere notability in relation to my cousin, Pulitzer-prize winner Jared Diamond. I realize, per WP:AUTO, that it's not my call, but if it were, I'd keep at least those two, and my great-grandfather the Polish vice-Finance Minister, under the principle of WP:BTW. --Elonka 21:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

:)
Dont you ever sleep :)) damn,you gotta like that picture a looooot hheeheh

Dzoni

Ice Cold 20:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)