User talk:Anon Nate

October 2013
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Free South Africa Movement, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  20:16, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Urtica dioica with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. RA talkcontribs 20:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Urtica dioica, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Urtica dioica was changed by Anon Nate (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912133 on 2013-10-27T20:24:39+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Urtica dioica. ... disco spinster   talk  20:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Seg hoe bros


A tag has been placed on Seg hoe bros requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at User:JohnCD, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  01:04, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:25, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Vsmith (talk) 01:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)