User talk:Anonaaa

"The Bilz" page was similar to "The Bilz and Kashif" page because of the necessity to add "and Kashif" since the individual is an extremely important part of the group and is therefore needed in the page. My apologies.
 * No problem, I redirected the page to The Bilz and Kashif. Victor Lopes (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks man, once again.

The Bilz and Kashif
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Bilz and Kashif, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: The Bilz. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Victor Lopes (talk) 01:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to The Bilz and Kashif constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. sinneed (talk) 01:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Bilz and Kashif. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Sturm55 (talk) 01:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Page moves
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a different title by copying its content and pasting it into. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. – Toon (talk)  13:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem: The Bilz and Kashif
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as The Bilz and Kashif, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.facebook.com/notes.php?id=11005788899, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:The Bilz and Kashif and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:The Bilz and Kashif with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:The Bilz and Kashif.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:The Bilz and Kashif saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! – Toon (talk)  17:56, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Bilz and Kashif


The article The Bilz and Kashif has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Likely even speedy material as there's hardly much here and the sources aren't convincing of better notability and improvement, searches also found nothing better than a few passing mentions here and there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister  talk  07:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)