User talk:Anonfan

A topic of interest to you is covered by discretionary sanctions under an Arbcom case
I think it would be best for you to take the spoilers off the page. People are going to look up this film, before and after they see the film and it's awful to have a film ruined for you, just because they googled the film and trust wikipedia.

Also, I was at a Q&A today where the writer, director and main actors were and they freely admitted that they took artistic license. I honestly am not on any side in the Shakespeare debate, but I think it's wrong to have spoilers in the second paragraph without at least putting SPOILER ALERT in the paragraph. If you want to put in negative issues and put your opinion that's one thing, but putting spoilers up on wikipedia is wrong. Everyone should be able to experience a film on their own. Because that is what it is, a film. Anonfan (talk) 05:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC)   Anonfan

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Shakespeare authorship question if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question. Tom Reedy (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Every movie article on Wikipedia has spoilers, and they are all sourced to sufficiently reliable sources for this article. Tom Reedy (talk) 05:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

There are plot points and then their are twists and spoilers.I am a filmmaker and a writer and I have read hundreds of Wiki articles over the years, especially films. Never have I felt induced to start an account just to make an edit. I was that disturbed by the amount of the story given away. If I hadn't seen the film, you would have totally ruined it for me. That's awful. Do you like knowing twists and turns of a story before you experience it? Doubtful. This is not a film based off of a classic. It's not Romeo and Juliet or Jane Eyre where everyone knows the twists. It's an easy fix, just take out the fact that he's shown as Elizabeth's son and that he fathered Southampton with her. This is the kind of film people are going to research. I saw the film and got on google right away to look into the theory, the film, the people ,etc.I have already seen the film, you're not hurting me. There's no reason to ruin it for everyone else. Anonfan (talk) 06:19, 22 October 2011 (UTC)   Anonfan