User talk:Anonmandan

October 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Billericay School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 23:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Billericay School, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 23:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Billericay School have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Meters (talk) 23:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Billericay School. Meters (talk) 23:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at The Billericay School shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.You will be banned if you continue. Uamaol (talk) 00:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Billericay School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Every time a Viner vandalizes the page about their school, an admin kills a server kitty. Please think of the server kitties.'' KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

He's dead, Jim
Let's party! KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)