User talk:Anonxyz123

Nomination of Alfred Kaskel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alfred Kaskel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alfred Kaskel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JTtheOG (talk) 23:23, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm Kunalforyou. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alfred Kaskel has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Жunal For You ☎️📝 16:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, he or she was blanking the tag (and not the Afd tag) which is an implicit request for speedy deletion by page creator, which he may well have every right to do, if the IP editor was also him, logged out, as I suspect. I am the only other editor to have worked on this page (adding categories) and I have no objection to his action. So this really should not be counted against him as a first warning, imo. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Were you trying to delete your article?
Because I do this it stands an excellent chance of being kept at Articles for deletion/Alfred Kaskel. best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)