User talk:Anonylyly

January 2016
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Megan McKenna— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 19:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gemma Collins. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gemma Collins was changed by Anonylyly (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90498 on 2016-01-20T19:50:09+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gemma Collins, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 19:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gemma Collins. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 18:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)