User talk:Anonymous-blue-moon

November 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Alaskan Klee Kai has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alaskan Klee Kai was changed by Anonymous-blue-moon (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961105 on 2020-11-02T19:20:33+00:00

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alaskan Klee Kai, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 19:28, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Alaskan Klee Kai, you may be blocked from editing. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 20:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alaskan Klee Kai. Materialscientist (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello. I realise you have been trying to improve Wikipedia by adding content based upon your knowledge, but I'm afraid that is not how Wikipedia works, and you've already had a few warnings about this. I have blocked you for only a very short time just to avoid further disruption and as a 'shot across the bows'. Please, please take heed, and help us improve Wikipedia articles. But everything added needs to be Verifiable to published sources, available to anyone at any time. Printed books, online newspaper sites, journals are all fine; personal knowledge (no matter how expert you are) is simply not ok unless you can point to those published sources. When the block expires, please bear this in mind, as we don't want to lose you. We just want you to work with us in the way we require. Kind regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi Anonymous-blue-moon! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you can cite a reliable source, nobody will have an issue with your edit. Please visit the Teahouse (above) if you have any questions. Happy editing! William Harris (talk) 08:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)