User talk:Anonymous427

September 2015
Hello, I'm ScottDavis. An edit that you recently made to Barton Highway seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Scott Davis Talk 07:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited East West Link, Melbourne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Freeway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Melmann. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tony Abbott, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Melmann (talk) 12:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WestConnex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Western Motorway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Freeways in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western Distributor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited East West Link (Melbourne), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Freeway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North East Link, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labor Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * East West Link (Melbourne)
 * added a link pointing to Eastern Freeway


 * Transport in Melbourne
 * added a link pointing to East West Link

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Western Distributor infobox
Thanks for creating the infobox on the Western Distributor article. The image is mine, but is probably not the best one for the infobox. At the moment I can't think of anything better that would illustrate the project, however -- perhaps once the route has been finalised, particularly its link with the West Gate Freeway, something better may become apparent. BlackCab ( TALK ) 04:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North East Link, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East West Link. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited M80 Ring Road, Melbourne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East West Link. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Liberal Party of Australia
Reverted - lib party of australia does not hold 76 of 150 reps seats, the Coalition (Australia) does. see National Party of Australia and Liberal National Party of Queensland too. it's how we've always done it. if you wish to dispute it, you'll need to gain a new consensus on the article's talk page. Timeshift (talk) 09:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Malcolm Turnbull's photo
Hello Anonymous427, I agree with you that the 2015 photo should be used in the Malcolm Turnbull article. But changing it three times in one day is what is called edit warring, and is a sure way to end up getting your account blocked. So I suggest you participate in the discussion at Talk:Malcolm Turnbull. Let me know if you have any questions. Regards, AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Your recent editing history at Australian federal election, 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 08:57, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Please stop edit warring. Discuss your disputed edits on the talk page (here). Thanks, —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 09:47, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. —Mel<b style="color:#F20">bourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b> ☆ <sup style="color:#407">talk 10:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Warning
Anonymous427, you were given a warning yesterday about edit-warring, and also about WP:3RR; yet you chose to ignore those warnings, and proceeded to perform more reverts. This was a very clear violation of WP:3RR. I am choosing not to block you at the moment because in my judgement that would be a punitive block. Nonetheless, if I see any further evidence of edit-warring or disruptive evidence from you, it will be met with a block, even if it does not involve a violation of WP:3RR. You need to stop making small tweaks in the infobox against consensus, and instead discuss your edits on the talk page. Vanamonde (talk) 13:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Key policies in Turnbull's sidebar template
Please contribute to discussion here and as per wikipedia guidelines, await consensus before re-adding policies. Adding women's safety package only, and then adding immigration policy, is cherry picking. It may not seem like it, but there's plenty of numerous other key policies. WP:WEIGHT and a ton of other WP vios. Discuss and obtain consensus here. Thanks. Timeshift (talk) 06:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm NYCRuss. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Qantas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NYCRuss  ☎  02:18, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Qantas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 02:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Qantas. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 14:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Non-free image use
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Premier of South Australia, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Qantas. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 11:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''There is no need to replace KIA leaders with "vacant". '' —   IVORK  Discuss 08:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! 220  of  Borg 06:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Australia 108, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —<b style="color:#E22">Mel</b><b style="color:#F20">bourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b> ☆ <sup style="color:#407">talk 03:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Russia, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on WestConnex
Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-30/the-policy-and-politics-surrounding-sydneys-westconnex/7459952. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm WikiVirusC. Your recent edit to the page Sean Spicer appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See The NYT Mr. Spicer has agreed to stay on for two weeks to a month <b style="color:#000080"> WikiVirus </b> C  <b style="color:#008000">(talk)</b> 21:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Qantas destinations. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 23:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

How consensus works
You need to gain a new consensus if there is a dispute to change away from the status quo. When disputed, the status quo remains until such a new consensus is formed. Therefore, the current (status quo) Turnbull image stays until such time. Timeshift (talk) 07:02, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dustin Martin.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  11:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:41, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I note there is a long history warnings about problematic editing on your talk page. Please remember to seek WP:CONSENSUS before making potentially controversial edits. Editing against consensus is considered disruptive. If another editor objects to an edit then a discussion needs to be opened on the talk page of the article. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Malcolm Turnbull. ''There is a consensus-established image in place; stop breaking consensus, and perhaps discuss the change you wish to be made in the active discussion about said image. Changing the image in spite of consensus, and slipping it through without even an edit summary, is not only bad faith but disruptive. '' —<b style="color:#E22">Mel</b><b style="color:#F20">bourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b> ☆ <sup style="color:#407">talk 14:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Annastacia Palaszczuk. Thank you. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders  ‖ 07:43, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Queensland state election, 2017. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Green made a prediction of 48 seats, not 47; irrespective of whether the result is 47 or 48, don't misrepresent Green's prediction which is sourced (especially without explaining why) —<b style="color:#E22">Mel</b><b style="color:#F20">bourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b> ☆ <sup style="color:#407">talk 04:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

2017–18 Ashes series
Hi Anonymous427, as per the instructions at Template:Two-innings cricket match, team1 – Before the match starts, this is the home team. After the match starts, this is the team that bats first this is why I reverted your edits. – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:17, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Australian federal budget, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Federal budget ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2018_Australian_federal_budget check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2018_Australian_federal_budget?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Australian House of Representatives does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Thinker78 (talk) 21:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced
Hi. I noticed that you made one or more changes to the article Australian House of Representatives, but you didn't provide a reliable source. Per WP:UNSOURCED, "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution". In addition, the data in the infobox shouldn't contradict the data in the body of the article, as it is apparently happening. Thanks! Thinker78 (talk) 01:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Photo of Gladys Berejiklian
Gladys is smiling? The photo I put up was recent, public domain, fairly high resolution and contained ONLY Berejiklian. The one you reverted back to must be at least ten years old, is definitely not high-res and is a crop of a group of four. TheBustopher (talk) 11:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, anonymous, hopefully THIS one will be more to your liking, as she wistfully grins Gladys Berejiklian Crop P1060782.jpg My main problem with the one contained within the article is it is VERY old and is a group shot, not of just the one individual. It's also public domain. TheBustopher (talk) 12:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yep, the photo you want to use is from 2008. Please don't replace a photo now on WP with one that's ten years old.  I'm sure you can live with this one. TheBustopher (talk) 13:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve List of Australia T20I wicket-keepers
Hello, Anonymous427,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating List of Australia T20I wicket-keepers! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (<b style="color:#5F9EA0">talk</b>) 02:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Gladys Berejiklian
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on this article, but regarding this [edit summary], please see WP:NLT. Thank you, Melcous (talk) 10:19, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2015 United Kingdom general election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Impru 20 talk 14:12, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Michael Daley. Thank you. 17:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Morrison Ministry a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  00:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Cahk. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2022 Australian federal election without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cahk (talk) 08:55, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australia A cricket team in England in 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marcus Harris ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Australia_A_cricket_team_in_England_in_2019 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Australia_A_cricket_team_in_England_in_2019?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

2021–22 Ashes series moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2021–22 Ashes series, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 07:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australia national cricket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Harris ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Australia_national_cricket_team check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Australia_national_cricket_team?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of England Test cricketers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Anderson ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_England_Test_cricketers check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_England_Test_cricketers?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Captain (cricket), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rashid Khan ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Captain_%28cricket%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Captain_%28cricket%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Bushfire Relief Cricket Match moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bushfire Relief Cricket Match, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 02:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:2021–22 Ashes series concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2021–22 Ashes series, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, without citing a reliable source. ''Dominic Raab is not Deputy Prime Minister, he is First Secretary of State - this has been made clear multiple times. ''-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> David J Johnson (talk) 09:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Virgin Australia has not yet announced voluntary administration, and if (when) it does, that will not cause Virgin Australia Holdings to immediately cease to exist as your edit suggested. Please don't jump the gun. 12:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Copyright violation
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Derek Sloan article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Yamla (talk) 09:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

BLP discretionary sanctions alert
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:09, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Victorian state election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael O'Brien ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2022_Victorian_state_election check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2022_Victorian_state_election?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chairman of the International Cricket Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honorary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Bushfire Relief Cricket Match concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bushfire Relief Cricket Match, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bushfire Relief Cricket Match


Hello, Anonymous427. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bushfire Relief Cricket Match".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ProfPaulKelly.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ProfPaulKelly.jpg, which you've attributed to https://www.health.gov.au/news/health-alerts/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-health-alert/government-response-to-the-covid-19-outbreak/our-medical-experts. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:MichaelDaley.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MichaelDaley.jpg, which you've attributed to https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/members/Pages/member-details.aspx?pk=27. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:JodiMcKay.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JodiMcKay.jpg, which you've attributed to https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/members/Pages/member-details.aspx?pk=37. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:MichaelO'BrienMLA.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MichaelO'BrienMLA.jpg, which you've attributed to https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/about/people-in-parliament/members-search/list-all-current-shadow-ministers/details/22/73. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:TerryMillsMP.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TerryMillsMP.jpg, which you've attributed to https://parliament.nt.gov.au/members/by-name/terry-mills. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:01, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pat Cummins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Carey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on General Achievement Test; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''This has already been discussed on the talk page, which you would have known had you bothered to read the edit summaries or the talk page. Your fake edit summary didn't help.'' Meters (talk) 23:52, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at General Achievement Test. ''We have discussed it on the talk page. You didn't participate in the discussion. Feel free to add your comments, but don't tell us that we have not discussed it and need to do so.'' Meters (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * And do not call such an edit minor. See WP:MINOR. A major content change such as that is not minor, and neither is a clearly contentious revert. Meters (talk) 23:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Can you please consistently use Edit summaries every time you make a change to an article. It's makes it so much easier for other editors if they can see what you aim was in making an edit without having to trawl through your changes and guess. HiLo48 (talk) 21:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 AFL finals series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Simpson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

American politics discretionary sanctions notice
― Tartan357  ( Talk ) 02:05, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 United States presidential election. ― Tartan357  ( Talk ) 02:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of India Test wicket-keepers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of India Test wicket-keepers, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/List of Australia Test wicket-keepers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Johnny Mullagh Medal winners
Template:Johnny Mullagh Medal winners has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Störm  (talk)  22:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Tartan357. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Assembly of the Union, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Tartan357  Talk 02:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

cut and paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give State Counsellor of Myanmar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into State Leader of Myanmar. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 02:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of State Leader of Myanmar


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at State Leader of Myanmar. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 02:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hi Anonymous427! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 AFL season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nathan Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Date headings at COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
Anonymous427, Do you realise that edits like this may not be a good idea, as then there are now multiple sections called "2020" (six of) and "2021" (five of) on this page? It seems the editing software cannot tell them apart. If someone edits the third "2020' on the page, then tries to go back there by clicking on the 'section link' in their contributions list, they will not be linked to the right section? Regards, 220  of  ßorg 04:45, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes it does what I expected, as above, I just did a 'null' test edit at "2020" under the "Northern Territory" heading. When I clicked on the 'section heading' at "(→‎2020: test edit @ in NT)" in my contributions, it took me to the first "2020" heading which is under "New South Wales", not the one I actually edited. FYI, 220  of  ßorg 05:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

2021 Samoan general election move
Hi there, please wait for the requested move for April 2021 Samoan general election to go through. If you just copy and paste the content, we'll lose all the edit history. Jpatokal (talk) 04:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Nick-D (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked for adding a photo added under an obviously mistaken claim it was released under a Wikipedia-compliant licences to multiple articles. As you have a lengthy history of copyright problems, including for similar issues as noted above, I have set the block duration to indefinite. Please note that this is not a permanent block, and you will be unblocked if you demonstrate that you understand Wikipedia's copyright policies and will follow them in future. Nick-D (talk) 10:02, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2021–22 Ashes series
Hello, Anonymous427. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021–22 Ashes series, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Shooting Spirit 007. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether) 11:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)